1996
DOI: 10.1136/thx.51.10.977
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal particle size for beta 2 agonist and anticholinergic aerosols in patients with severe airflow obstruction.

Abstract: Background -The optimal particle size of a P2 agonist or anticholinergic aerosol in patients with severe airflow obstruction is unknown. Methods -Seven stable patients with a mean forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) of 37.9% of the predicted value inhaled three types of monodisperse salbutamol and ipratropium bromide aerosols with particle sizes of 1.5 gm, 2.8 rtm, and 5 gm, respectively, and a placebo aerosol. The volunteers inhaled 20 ftg salbutamol and 8 ftg ipratropium bromide, after which lung f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
56
2
5

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
3
56
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…A limited number of studies have been published about the relationship between mass median aerodynamic diameter and deposition patterns in the lung, but these have involved small numbers of subjects, showed limitations in methodology, and occasionally led to discrepant conclusions. [19][20][21][22] Thus, currently there is no predictive relationship between changes in APSD and clinical results. Without a clinically defined "permitted difference" or a "gold standard" to which the outcome of the statistical procedure could be compared, the experienced judgment of the WG members using "target profiles" described previously 7 was the best available option.…”
Section: E7mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A limited number of studies have been published about the relationship between mass median aerodynamic diameter and deposition patterns in the lung, but these have involved small numbers of subjects, showed limitations in methodology, and occasionally led to discrepant conclusions. [19][20][21][22] Thus, currently there is no predictive relationship between changes in APSD and clinical results. Without a clinically defined "permitted difference" or a "gold standard" to which the outcome of the statistical procedure could be compared, the experienced judgment of the WG members using "target profiles" described previously 7 was the best available option.…”
Section: E7mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, it is still unknown what is the optimal particle size able to provide greater improvements in lung function. In this regard, the discrepancy between the study from Zanen et al [13] and that from Usmani et al [14] which specifically addressed the clinical benefit as a function of the particle size of the inhaled bronchodilator, could be only apparent, since the asthmatic volunteers differed in terms of magnitude of airway obstruction. Findings with this methodology generally replicate those obtained with the Andersen impactor device.…”
Section: Comparing Devices For Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseasesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Normalmente, aquelas menores que 5 μm depositam-se nas vias aéreas distais, sendo que as menores que 0,5 μm tendem a ser exaladas com a expiração [8][9][10][11][12] . Entretanto, em pacientes com doença pulmonar obstrutiva crônica, o tamanho ideal gira em torno de 2 a 3 μm [13][14][15][16] . O tamanho e densidade das partículas de um aerossol são classificadas através do diâmetro mediano aerodinâmico de massa (DMAM).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified