2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.12.158
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal parameters estimation and input subset for grey model based on chaotic particle swarm optimization algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ze Zhao et al (2012) used a grey forecasting model optimized by a differential evolution algorithm to forecast the per capita annual net income of rural households in China. Jianzhou Wang, Zhu, Zhao, and Zhu et al (2011), Zhilong Wang,Liu, Wu, and Wang et al (2012 presented an optimal parameters estimation for the grey model based on a chaotic particle swarm optimization algorithm (CPSO).…”
Section: Introducementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ze Zhao et al (2012) used a grey forecasting model optimized by a differential evolution algorithm to forecast the per capita annual net income of rural households in China. Jianzhou Wang, Zhu, Zhao, and Zhu et al (2011), Zhilong Wang,Liu, Wu, and Wang et al (2012 presented an optimal parameters estimation for the grey model based on a chaotic particle swarm optimization algorithm (CPSO).…”
Section: Introducementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically they are both suggested to be 2.0 (Pedrycz, Park, & Pizzi, 2009;Tang et al, 2010;Tian & Lai, 2014;Wang et al, 2011;Xi et al, 2008). However, Xi et al (2008) also states that assigning different values to c 1 and c 2 sometimes leads to better performance.…”
Section: Parameters Selectionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The acceleration coefficients c 1 ; c 2 can be used to control how far a particle will move in a single iteration and thus may exert an great influence on the convergence speed of PSO (Wang, Zhu, Zhao, & Zhu, 2011;Xi et al, 2008). Typically they are both suggested to be 2.0 (Pedrycz, Park, & Pizzi, 2009;Tang et al, 2010;Tian & Lai, 2014;Wang et al, 2011;Xi et al, 2008).…”
Section: Parameters Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the system develops further, the significance of the older data reduces [9,48]. Therefore, the training data, retained after rolling, were applied to the SGM(1,1), MCSGM(1,1) and CMCSGM(1,1) models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%