1988
DOI: 10.1080/00207178808906128
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal output feedback regulation with frequency-shaped cost functional

Abstract: The theory of optimal output feedback control is extended to a class of quadratic performance measures whose weighting matrices are functions of frequency. The incorporation of frequency-dependent weighting matrices allows one to emphasise or de-emphasise the importance of the variables being penalised over specific bands of frequencies. Optimization of the frequency-shaped performance measure yields optimal compensators that can be more meaningful for certain minimisation problems. Results are presented for d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Let Sx' and Sy, denote the orthonormal transformations that diagonalize, respectively, the symmetric matrices (AA; + A,A) and (A; V + VA,) such that AA; + A;A = SXiAx;S~i A; V + VA; = Sy,Ay,S~; where A xi and A y , are the diagonal matrices containing eigenvalues of (AA; + A;A) and (A; V + VA,), respectively. Then, a modification of the Algorithm I given by Cheok et al (1988) may be used for solving the robust control gain P specified by (29) and (30), and is given in the following algorithm.…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let Sx' and Sy, denote the orthonormal transformations that diagonalize, respectively, the symmetric matrices (AA; + A,A) and (A; V + VA,) such that AA; + A;A = SXiAx;S~i A; V + VA; = Sy,Ay,S~; where A xi and A y , are the diagonal matrices containing eigenvalues of (AA; + A;A) and (A; V + VA,), respectively. Then, a modification of the Algorithm I given by Cheok et al (1988) may be used for solving the robust control gain P specified by (29) and (30), and is given in the following algorithm.…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A dynamic simulation of the system will certainly provide more student interest, a better appreciation of the difference between passive and active control, and a better feel for the physics of the vibration of the vehicle (Haug, Sohono, Kim and Seong, 1984;Hirose, Matsushige, Buma and Kamaya, 1986;Cheok, Loh, McGee and Petit, 1985;Cheok, Hu and Loh, 1988;1989). A dynamic simulation of the system will certainly provide more student interest, a better appreciation of the difference between passive and active control, and a better feel for the physics of the vibration of the vehicle (Haug, Sohono, Kim and Seong, 1984;Hirose, Matsushige, Buma and Kamaya, 1986;Cheok, Loh, McGee and Petit, 1985;Cheok, Hu and Loh, 1988;1989).…”
Section: P R O G R a M C: Vehicle Suspension Control Sys-temmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of such a performance index with frequencydependent weighting matrices was suggested by Gupta [5]. According to the study by Cheok et a1 [6], the problem of finding an optimal control which minimizes the generalized frequency-shaped cost functional subject to the dynamic constraints can be equivalently transformed into a minimization of the performance index in the time domain with an augmented dynamic constraint. The presence of exciting frequencies to which the human body is sensitive is obviously to be avoided.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%