2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2010.09.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal non-proportional reinsurance control and stochastic differential games

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
28
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
3
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a slightly different strand of research, Browne (2000), Zeng (2010) and Taksar and Zeng (2011) consider zero-sum stochastic differential games between two competitive investors/insurers. Besides, Bensoussan and Frehse (2000) examine the non-zero-sum stochastic differential game with N players over an infinite time horizon.…”
Section: And Elliot and Siumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a slightly different strand of research, Browne (2000), Zeng (2010) and Taksar and Zeng (2011) consider zero-sum stochastic differential games between two competitive investors/insurers. Besides, Bensoussan and Frehse (2000) examine the non-zero-sum stochastic differential game with N players over an infinite time horizon.…”
Section: And Elliot and Siumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12. A different approach following the same intuition is presented by Taksar and Zeng (2011), who develop a scenario in which a stochastic differential game is carried out between two re-ensurers, where both companies attempt to reduce risk exposure. 13.…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For maximizing/minimizing a payoff function depending on the difference of two insurance companies' surplus processes, Zeng (2010) and Taksar and Zeng (2011) studied a zero-sum stochastic differential game between two insurers by applying proportional and non-proportional reinsurance, respectively. Bensoussan et al (2014) studied the relative performance of two insurance companies under a nonzero sum stochastic differential game framework.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%