1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-6296(96)00529-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal non-linear health insurance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
64
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
8
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This concept was introduced by Arrow 20 in health insurance markets. Pauly, 21 Zeckhauser, 22 Spence and Zeckhauser (1971), Blomqvist (1997), Cutler and Zeckhauser 7 and Goldman and Philipson (2007) derived optimal reimbursement policy in the presence of ex-post moral hazard. The idea beyond all of these studies is an expected utility maximisation subject to zero profit of insurance company.…”
Section: Theoretical and Empirical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This concept was introduced by Arrow 20 in health insurance markets. Pauly, 21 Zeckhauser, 22 Spence and Zeckhauser (1971), Blomqvist (1997), Cutler and Zeckhauser 7 and Goldman and Philipson (2007) derived optimal reimbursement policy in the presence of ex-post moral hazard. The idea beyond all of these studies is an expected utility maximisation subject to zero profit of insurance company.…”
Section: Theoretical and Empirical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following Spence and Zeckhauser (1971), Blomqvist (1997) and Bajari et al, 27 we specify representative consumer's utility as a function of their wealth (w), nature's action (y) which reflects external shocks on their health status, and the choice variable of individuals (m), which can be treated as the invested amount of money on their health. We consider (m) as the total expenditures on medicine and paraclinical services.…”
Section: The Analytical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What remains observable is health care expenditure (HCE), and the optimizing instrument in the hands of the insurer is once more the degree of cost sharing. As shown by Zeckhauser (1970) and more recently Blomqvist (1997), a cost-sharing rule that is non-linear in expenditure turns out to be generally optimal. For example, Buchanan et al (1991) simulate optimal insurance policies to arrive at a $200 deductible and a 25% coinsurance rate, whereas Blomqvist (1997) comes up with a cost sharing of 27% at roughly $1,000 and declining to 5% at roughly $30,000.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…These other factors are beyond the scope of this paper but include patients' degree of risk aversion; the extent to which patient charges affect the use of dental services; and the oral health benefits of particular treatments. [2][3][4][5] Another issue not discussed in this paper is the form of patient charges. Both in Scotland and England these are in the form of user charges, which depend upon the use of the GDS.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%