Psychiatric disorders were once attributed primarily to neurotransmitter and hormone disturbances, but in the last decade increasing attention has been devoted to growth factors that could affect neurogenesis and neuroplasticity. In this regard, brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2), glial-derived neurotrophic factor, vascular endothelial growth factor, and neurotrophin-3 and 4 have all been implicated in major depressive illness.1,2 Among other sources of evidence supporting this perspective were the findings that depressive disorders were associated with structural brain changes indicative of disturbed neuroplasticity, including reductions of hippocampal neurogenesis as well as disturb ances of cortical and subcortical synaptogenesis and dendritic branching.3,4 Coupled with the findings that BDNF is often reduced in depressed patients and in response to stressful events, whereas chronic antidepressant treatments antagonized such effects, 5 a strong case was made that deficiencies of trophic factor might contribute to neuroplastic changes that render individuals vulnerable to depression. Hence, finding novel means of stimulating endogenous neurotrophic mechan isms or administration of trophic factors themselves could constitute the next wave of antidepressants.As impressive as the data have been regarding the role of BDNF in depression, they have not been uniformly supportive of this perspective, 6 and there are several unresolved issues that need to be considered. Specifically, BDNF and FGF-2 alterations have not only been associated with depressive disorders, but have also been observed in relation to schizophrenia 7 and neurodegenerative disorders, 8 indicating their lack of specificity in relation to brain and behavioural pathology. This is not altogether surprising given the general importance of neurotrophic factors, such as BDNF, in essential processes, including neuronal survival and plasticity (e.g., neurogenesis, synaptogenesis). Hence, disturbances of trophic factors might impart vulnerabilities that could dispose individuals toward several psychiatric and/or neurologic conditions. That said, the very fact that several different growth factors in addition to BDNF have also been associated with depression begs the question of whether they have additive or interactive effects with respect to pathology, and whether changes of one growth factor might compensate for that of another. There is also the question of how and when BDNF might interact with environmental triggers in promoting depression. Moreover, even if it is accepted that BDNF disturbances contribute to the evolution of depressive disorders, how can this information currently be used in the develop ment of treatments for these disorders?One line of research that might be pertinent in this regard concerns the possibility that genetic biomarkers might be able to predict the occurrence of illness and the efficacy of treatment strategies. Indeed, a single nucleotide polymorphism, in which a valine (val) to me...