2022
DOI: 10.1111/jfr3.12825
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal multireservoir operation for flood control under constrained operational rules

Abstract: This paper presents a multireservoir flood control model that incorporates operating rules to alleviate the risk that results from traditional flood control models. The model is accurately reformulated into one that can be solved with the mixed integer linear programming (MILP) and approximated with a two‐stage linear programming (TSLP) to speed up the solution by excluding all the binary variables. A scroll decision‐making strategy is proposed by assuming only a few days of future inflows being predicted with… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(29 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Various techniques have been developed over the past few decades to address reservoir scheduling problems 9 .These include linear programming 9 11 , nonlinear programming 12 and dynamic programming 13 15 .However, each of these methods has its limitations. While nonlinear programming methods have their advantages, they tend to have relatively slow convergence speeds and require longer computation times, posing significant challenges in practical applications 16 , 17 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various techniques have been developed over the past few decades to address reservoir scheduling problems 9 .These include linear programming 9 11 , nonlinear programming 12 and dynamic programming 13 15 .However, each of these methods has its limitations. While nonlinear programming methods have their advantages, they tend to have relatively slow convergence speeds and require longer computation times, posing significant challenges in practical applications 16 , 17 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are complex hydrological and hydraulic connections among the elements of the flood control system, so the flood control operation problem of reservoir groups has the characteristics of strong constraint, multi-stage, nonlinearity, and high dimension [8]. In the past, most scholars used traditional algorithms, such as dynamic programming [9][10][11] and linear programming [12,13], to solve this problem. However, with the increase in the operation period and the number of reservoirs, the problems of slow convergence and "dimension disaster" will appear [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, the commonly used methods for solving flood control optimization models include traditional and intelligent optimization algorithms (Needham Jason et al 2000;Cheng et al 2008). Traditional optimization algorithms such as linear programming (Senlin Chen et al 2017;Needham Jason et al 2000;Zetai et al 2022), nonlinear programming (Unver et al 1990), and dynamic programming (Yakowitz 1982;Zhao et al 2017;Cervellera et al 2006) have been utilized. However, research has shown that as the operating cycle prolongs, the number of reservoirs increases, and the time step size increases, these methods exhibit a decrease in convergence speed and face the problem of the "curse of dimensionality" (Diao et al 2021;Shimin Li et al 2020a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%