Optimal Multi-Target Lambert Rendezvous

Bang, Junil; Ahn, Ji-Whan

doi:10.2514/6.2016-5510

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

A Phase A: Elementary Solution Generation1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2018

2022

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Other1

Relationship

Self Cite1

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Phase A obtains all local minima of every single-target rendezvous problem (PS) instantiated by specified departure/arrival objects, which provide the elementary solutions of the overall problem (Bang and Ahn 2016) 4 . We first explore the patterns in the locations of local minima of PS.…”

Section: A Phase A: Elementary Solution Generationmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Two-phase framework for near-optimal multi-target Lambert rendezvous

Bang

Ahn

2018

Advances in Space Research

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper proposes a two-phase framework to solve an optimal multi-target Lambert rendezvous problem. The first phase solves a series of single-target rendezvous problems for all departure-arrival object pairs to generate the elementary solutions, which provides candidate rendezvous trajectories (elementary solutions). The second phase formulates a variant of traveling salesman problem (TSP) using the elementary solutions prepared in the first phase and determines the best rendezvous sequence and trajectories of the multi-target rendezvous problem. The validity of the proposed optimization framework is demonstrated through an asteroid exploration case study.

show abstract

Section: A Phase A: Elementary Solution Generationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A preliminary version of the procedure to solve the single-target rendezvous optimization problem introduced in this subsection was presented in authors' previous conference paper(Bang and Ahn 2016).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%