2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.pss.2012.11.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal longitudes determination for the station keeping of areostationary satellites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mars has a very uneven gravitational pull due to large asymmetries in mass, making station keeping particularly problematic, especially for LMO. This would require considerable delta-V to maintain the orbit [60]. If a solenoid were to be placed in an areostationary orbit for Mars (the equivalent of Earth's geostationary) of a R 0 = 6R M then the much wider loop radius drastically reduces the magnetic field intensity needed to reach ∼100nT at R S =10R M of 460nT and consequently requires more than an order of magnitude less current at < 0.2GAmps.…”
Section: Solenoid Locations In Spacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mars has a very uneven gravitational pull due to large asymmetries in mass, making station keeping particularly problematic, especially for LMO. This would require considerable delta-V to maintain the orbit [60]. If a solenoid were to be placed in an areostationary orbit for Mars (the equivalent of Earth's geostationary) of a R 0 = 6R M then the much wider loop radius drastically reduces the magnetic field intensity needed to reach ∼100nT at R S =10R M of 460nT and consequently requires more than an order of magnitude less current at < 0.2GAmps.…”
Section: Solenoid Locations In Spacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This term is responsible for the existence of two stable and two unstable geographical longitudes for an aerostationary satellite. The two unstable Martian longitudes equal − 105° and 75° [12]. Therefore, the following equally-spaced geographical longitudes are chosen for the three satellites placed in areostationary orbit: − 135°, − 15°, 105°.…”
Section: Coverage Analysis For 3 Satellites In Areostationary Orbitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Satellites in an areostationary orbit are subject to natural perturbations, which will incur added station keeping costs to maintain the spacecraft within prescribed mission required boundaries. ere exist four regions of longitudinal stability for areostationary satellites, which require minimal station keeping costs [7]. However, these locations are evenly distributed and continuous coverage from these points can only be ensured by a constellation of minimum four spacecraft.…”
Section: Mars Communications Constellation Missionmentioning
confidence: 99%