2018
DOI: 10.1080/03772063.2018.1491808
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Localization and Sizing of UPFC to Solve the Reactive Power Dispatch Problem Under Unbalanced Conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The uncertain power demands in a power system are commonly modeled by the normal distribution. The probability density function (PDF) of this distribution is according to (11). 20…”
Section: Power Demand Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The uncertain power demands in a power system are commonly modeled by the normal distribution. The probability density function (PDF) of this distribution is according to (11). 20…”
Section: Power Demand Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimal location and capacity of UPFC are proposed to improve the dynamic stability of the power system considering power losses and voltage deviation improvement in Reference 10. In Reference 11 a method is presented to determine the optimal location and UPFC sizing in the multi‐objective optimal reactive power dispatch (ORPD) problem considering unbalanced conditions. The Load‐ability maximization, voltage profile improvement, losses minimization, and available transfer capability (ATC) enhancement are the components of the proposed objective function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many researchers have presented sensitivity-based methods in the literature. Fractional Levy light-BatAlgorithm [20], Hybrid Cuckoo-Search-Algorithm [21], Modified-Differential evolution [22], Combined pso-based CPF [23], numerous-sensitivity-based-approaches [24], genetic algorithm [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32], refined-power-flow-algorithm [33], multiverse optimizer [34], reactive power dispatch problem [35], adaptive grass hooper optimization [36], Heuristic-Techniques [37], MILP-based-OPF [38], AWO-optimization [39], Gravitational-search-assisted algorithm [40][41][42], whale-optimization-algorithm [43,44], novel-lightning search-algorithm [45], PSO-adaptive-G.S.A. hybrid-algorithm [46], self-adaptive-DE-algorithm [47], fuzzy-harmony search algorithm [48], imperialisticcompetitive-algorithm [49], quasi-oppositional-chemical reaction optimization [50], brain-storm-optimization-algorithm [51], hybrid immune algorithm [52], teachinglearning-based-optimization [53], marine-vessels-analysis [54], optimal-power-flowproblem [55], evolutionary-particle swarm optimization [56], blended-moth flame optimization [57], population-based-evolutionary-optimization [58], MOPSO-algorithm…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some other articles, criteria weights determined by the decision maker were used [22]- [31]. In some publications, weights were used both equally and at the values determined by the decision maker and in different combinations according to different scenarios [32]- [36]. In all these studies, decision makers determined criteria weights according to their own importance levels, but did not control their consistency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%