2008 10th IEEE International Workshop on Advanced Motion Control 2008
DOI: 10.1109/amc.2008.4516141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal link design of a six degree of freedom micro parallel robot based on workspace analysis

Abstract: In this paper a mono-objective optimum design procedure for a six-degree of freedom parallel micro robot is outlined by using optimality criterion of workspace and numerical aspects. A mono-objective optimization problem is formulated by referring to a basic performance of parallel robots. Additional objective functions can be used to extend the proposed design procedure to more general but specific design problems. A kinematic optimization was performed to maximize the workspace of the mini parallel robot. Op… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The majority of the literature on design optimization of robotic manipulators use nonlinear and nonconvex methods to attack the problem. A brief account of such methods include the culling algorithm [2,3,4], different variations of the genetic algorithm [5,6,7,8], the differential evolution algorithm [9], performance-chart based methods [10], workspace atlases [11], controlled random search technique [12], and Monte Carlo method [13,14]. These methods have relative strengths and weaknesses;…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of the literature on design optimization of robotic manipulators use nonlinear and nonconvex methods to attack the problem. A brief account of such methods include the culling algorithm [2,3,4], different variations of the genetic algorithm [5,6,7,8], the differential evolution algorithm [9], performance-chart based methods [10], workspace atlases [11], controlled random search technique [12], and Monte Carlo method [13,14]. These methods have relative strengths and weaknesses;…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%