2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.automatica.2007.09.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal linear estimation for systems with multiple packet dropouts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
183
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 292 publications
(184 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
183
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Proof: It can be shown that (22) follows directly from (5)- (6) and (18), and therefore the proof is omitted for conciseness.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Proof: It can be shown that (22) follows directly from (5)- (6) and (18), and therefore the proof is omitted for conciseness.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the linearization is enforced to tackle the nonlinearities f (·) and h(·). As such, (22) and (23) involve ℵ 1,k and ℵ 2,k+1 which add extra computational difficulty for the design of filter gain. Actually, due to the consideration of the linearization errors, it is literally impossible to obtain the accurate value of the filtering error covariance P k+1|k+1 , and a seemingly natural way is to design appropriate filter gain K k+1 in order to guarantee an upper bound for the filtering error covariance that can then be minimized at each sampling instant.…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, perfect communication is not always possible in many engineering systems especially in a networked environment. For example, due to sensor temporal failure or network transmission delay/loss [6,18,19], at certain time points, the system measurement may contain noise only, which means the real signal is missing. Filtering problem with missing measurements has gained considerable research attention and many results have been reported in the literature, see [12,19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%