2004
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9496(2004)130:5(377)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Layout of Early Warning Detection Stations for Water Distribution Systems Security

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
93
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 297 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
93
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In water quality management, optimal sensor placement in WDS has also attracted special attention with the aim of identifying contamination sources (Ostfeld and Salomons 2004;Berry et al 2005;Propato, 2006;Berry et al 2006;Shastri1 and Diwekar 2006). They all typically minimize the risk from contamination using sensors for timely detection.…”
Section: Sampling Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In water quality management, optimal sensor placement in WDS has also attracted special attention with the aim of identifying contamination sources (Ostfeld and Salomons 2004;Berry et al 2005;Propato, 2006;Berry et al 2006;Shastri1 and Diwekar 2006). They all typically minimize the risk from contamination using sensors for timely detection.…”
Section: Sampling Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6,7] introduced an MIP(mixed integer programming) solution for the objective to minimize the expected fraction of population exposed to a contamination. The objective of [8,9] is to ensure that the expected impact of a contamination event is within a pre-specified level, and [8] introduced a formulation based on set cover and solved the problem using genetic algorithm while [9] use a MIP based solution. In order to achieve the objective defined in [10], [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] adopted multi-objective optimization by different methods such as heuristic, predator-prey model or local search method and [22] used the submodular property to achieve an approximation guarantee.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Allmann and Carlson (2005) analyzed the intentional introduction, spread and detection of several known contaminants in a distribution system. Others including Lee and Deininger (1992), Kessler et al (1998), andOstfeld (2004), have sought to optimize the placement of water monitoring stations in distribution systems.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An attempt was made to maximize the sensor's upstream coverage, and distribute sensors evenly across the target area, however, no rigorous mathematical optimization was performed. Others have conducted research into algorithms to determine the optimal placement of sensors (e.g., Lee and Deininger, 1992;Kessler et al, 1998;Ostfeld and Salomons, 2004), which is a topic beyond the scope of this study. Each sensor was assumed to be capable of identifying contaminants from the region of the distribution system upstream of the sensor's location.…”
Section: Application Of Bbns To a Distribution System Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%