2019
DOI: 10.1109/tcc.2016.2560808
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Joint Scheduling and Cloud Offloading for Mobile Applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
94
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 197 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
94
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For this purpose, we have considered the test DAG4 reported in Fig. 15, that is typically considered in the literature for comparing task allocation policies under different service models [33]. Specifically, DAG4 details the workflow of a real-world video navigation program for mobile stream application.…”
Section: G Performance Sensitivity On the Adopted Service Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For this purpose, we have considered the test DAG4 reported in Fig. 15, that is typically considered in the literature for comparing task allocation policies under different service models [33]. Specifically, DAG4 details the workflow of a real-world video navigation program for mobile stream application.…”
Section: G Performance Sensitivity On the Adopted Service Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, including in the afforded JOP formulation also the dynamic optimization of the task-execution ordering followed by the computing nodes may be a first research direction of potential interest. The main expected challenge stems from the fact that the dynamic optimization of the task scheduling discipline has been recently proved to be an NP-hard integer-valued problem, even in the basic case of fixed resource allocation [33].…”
Section: Conclusion and Hints For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and D a i being the auxiliary variables introduced corresponding to the uplink transmission time, downlink transmission time, and the CAP processing time, respectively. Auxiliary variables D u i and D d i are similarly defined as in (15) and (16), except that x ij in (15) and (16) is now replaced by (x a ij + x c ij ). Similar to these two constraints, the new auxiliary variable D a i for the CAP processing time also introduces a new constraint…”
Section: Multi-user Multi-task Offloading With Cap (Mumto-c) Algormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We consider that the mobiles and VMs have unbounded computation capacities and the monomial order m = 3, since it can fairly approximate the transmission-energy consumption in practice. 7 More importantly, it will lead to useful insights into the structure of the optimal policy as shown in the sequel that the optimal time-division policy admits a defined effective computing-power balancing structure.…”
Section: Optimal Resource Management With Identical Arrival-deadlimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, for each epoch, the derived time-division policy only determines the offloading durations allocated for different mobiles, without specifying the scheduling order. In other words, if considering the scheduling order, one time-division policy resulted from the solution to Problem P1 can correspond to multiple 7 The results can be extended to derive the suboptimal policy for the case of m = 3 by using approximating techniques, although the corresponding optimal policy has no closed form which can be computed by iterative algorithms.…”
Section: Optimal Resource Management With Identical Arrival-deadlimentioning
confidence: 99%