2001
DOI: 10.2143/ast.31.1.1001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Insurance Coverage under Bonus-Malus Contracts

Abstract: The paper analyses the questions: Should -or should not -an individual buy insurance? And if so, what insurance coverage should he or she prefer? Unlike classical studies of optimal insurance coverage, this paper analyses these questions from a bonus-malus point of view, that is, for insurance contracts with individual bonus-malus (experience rating or no-claim) adjustments. The paper outlines a set of new statements for bonus-malus contracts and compares them with corresponding classical statements for standa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These questions lead to a classical field of insurance economics: optimal insurance coverage. Holtan (2001), which is based on -and a direct extension of -this paper, analyses these questions particularly for bonus-malus contracts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These questions lead to a classical field of insurance economics: optimal insurance coverage. Holtan (2001), which is based on -and a direct extension of -this paper, analyses these questions particularly for bonus-malus contracts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This question is in fact part of the general problem of purchasing optimal insurance coverage, which has been extensively studied under varying conditions in insurance economics. Holtan (2001) analyses this problem particularly for bonus-malus contracts. But to do so, we first have to outline the necessary concepts of -and insight to -bonus-malus contracts, which is part of the objective of this paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An example of a mix of these elements is e.g. treated in Holtan (2001), with focus on customer purchasing rationality of individual insurance bonus-malus contracts. This wide business approach demands definitely a dynamic pricing approach, that is, a process which continuously or regularly… -adjust the price levels to reach risk ratio and combined ratio goals, -innovate, update and re-estimate risk price models and parameters, -track competitors' price rates and product/service value propositions, -test market price adjustments to learn optimal price adjustments, -implement champion-challenger price adjustments, -communicate with distribution departments to optimize the sales forces.…”
Section: International Best Practice Of Insurance Pricingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They proved that an insured would file a claim only if it is larger than some critical value that is higher than the positive deductible amount. Holtan [8,9] investigated the characteristics of the deductible insurance policy in the presence of the bonus-malus adjustments and showed that the bonus-malus policies cannot be mutually optimal (in sense of being Pareto optimal) to both the insured and the insurer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%