Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms 2009
DOI: 10.1137/1.9781611973068.21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Halfspace Range Reporting in Three Dimensions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
117
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
117
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Define the query cost in the same manner, as in (1). Note the query cost of a partial partition tree upper-bounds the number of internal and leaf cells crossed by a hyperplane, but does not account for the cost of any auxiliary data structures we plan to store at the leaves.…”
Section: Proofmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Define the query cost in the same manner, as in (1). Note the query cost of a partial partition tree upper-bounds the number of internal and leaf cells crossed by a hyperplane, but does not account for the cost of any auxiliary data structures we plan to store at the leaves.…”
Section: Proofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We don't need to compute X ∆ i ( R), but rather we try different values of r (powers of 2) until we find a cutting with the right number of subcells. Thus, the expected cost over all iterations is O(t)(b log N ) O (1) . By Markov's inequality, with probability Ω(1), this bound holds; if not, we declare failure.…”
Section: By Lemma 23 the Number Of Subcells Is O(b)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Combining with the recent result of Afshani and Chan [1] for 3D halfspace range reporting, we obtain a structure for the variable-threshold version of our problem with O(n log 2 n) space and O(log 3 n + k) query time (Section 4). Although the bounds have extra log factors in this case, our result shows that this problem is still significantly easier than 2D simplex queries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%