2021
DOI: 10.1080/17938120.2021.1898231
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal government size and economic growth in developing and MENA countries: A dynamic panel threshold analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Those results are in line with results from Fetahi-Vehapi et al ( 2015), Dritsakis and Stamatiou (2016), who revealed a positive trade openness impact on economic growth in EU countries, and Alfonso and Jalles (2011), who found a negative relationship between government size and economic growth. Some authors (Nouira & Kouni, 2021;Zungu & Greyling, 2021) identified a threshold (10-30 per cent depending on the country) above which the government size negatively related to economic growth.…”
Section: Results Of the Evaluation Infrastructure Development Impact ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those results are in line with results from Fetahi-Vehapi et al ( 2015), Dritsakis and Stamatiou (2016), who revealed a positive trade openness impact on economic growth in EU countries, and Alfonso and Jalles (2011), who found a negative relationship between government size and economic growth. Some authors (Nouira & Kouni, 2021;Zungu & Greyling, 2021) identified a threshold (10-30 per cent depending on the country) above which the government size negatively related to economic growth.…”
Section: Results Of the Evaluation Infrastructure Development Impact ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The models on the effects of debt commonly include general government final consumption expenditure (% of GDP) to proxy the size of the public sector. Nouira and Kouni (2021) present a discussion on the effects of public spending on economic growth and estimate the inverted U-shaped relationship between the size of the public sector and the rate of growth of output. Section 2 explains that whether the effect will be positive or negative depends on household consumption and private investment responses to an increase in government spending (and public debt).…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These variables also represent the size of the public sector, as an increase in the share of the private sector in GDP is associated with a decrease in the share of the public sector. Furthermore, research includes investment and consumption shares in growth regressions to determine whether the economy is consumption-or investment-led (Kim 2017;Nouira and Kouni 2021).…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Armey (1995) illustrates such nonlinear relationship between government size and economic growth as an “inverted-U” shaped curve, also known as the Armey curve. Most of the existing research studies that test the existence of Armey curve use panel data analysis ( Kustepeli, 2005 ; Vaziri et al., 2011 ; Facchini and Melki, 2013 ; Hok et al., 2014 ; Asimakopoulos and Karavias, 2016 ; Ali and Khan, 2017 ; Kim et al., 2018 ; Murshed et al., 2018 ; Nouira and Kouni, 2021 ). Little evidence was found in the studies using time series dynamic threshold approach by Hansen (2000) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%