2008 40th North American Power Symposium 2008
DOI: 10.1109/naps.2008.5307329
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal generator bidding strategies for power and ancillary services using game theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, for a generator operating strictly within its active power limits: (24) Equation (24) shows that is the marginal profit of generator . As such, it cannot be adopted to define financial compensation for active power provision.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, for a generator operating strictly within its active power limits: (24) Equation (24) shows that is the marginal profit of generator . As such, it cannot be adopted to define financial compensation for active power provision.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, such proposals have taken into consideration the local characteristics of the reactive support [17], system security [18]- [20], and, in case of reserves, reliability [21]. Works were also published with analysis of generator market power and strategic behavior in reactive power markets [20], [22]- [24]. Different optimization models have been proposed to represent the problem of optimally dispatching reactive power under competition, some of them being straightforward extensions of the OPF problem [8], [10], [13], while others include different representations of generator opportunity costs and also costs associated with reactive power provided by network equipment [11], [14], [17], [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For simplicity, the majority of works deal with a unique reserve product. Some authors do not explicit the type of reserve considered (see [41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49]), whereas others refer to spinning reserve (see [14,[37][38][39][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63]).…”
Section: Type Of Reservesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [49,62], an additional cost is incurred in the objective function so as to explicitly contemplate the energy opportunity cost of providing reserves. In sequential dispatches, the absence of this cost would lead to neglect the interaction between markets, whereas in joint dispatches, this opportunity cost is implicitly taken into account and does not require a term in the objective function.…”
Section: Interaction Between Commodities (Opportunity Cost)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation