2011
DOI: 10.5414/cn106657
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal frequency of parathyroid hormone monitoring in chronic hemodialysis patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gaweda et al 15 examined the optimal frequency of hemoglobin sampling and concluded that weekly measurements associated with the lowest degree of hemoglobin variability. Greenberg et al 16 compared quarterly versus monthly monitoring policies for parathyroid hormone (PTH) and demonstrated that monthly measurement was associated with a higher likelihood of readings being within the recommended range. Yokoyama et al 17 concluded that in patients for whom serum CKD-MBD markers exceeded target range, weekly monitoring of calcium and monthly monitoring of PTH levels were associated with achievement of guidelinerecommended targets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gaweda et al 15 examined the optimal frequency of hemoglobin sampling and concluded that weekly measurements associated with the lowest degree of hemoglobin variability. Greenberg et al 16 compared quarterly versus monthly monitoring policies for parathyroid hormone (PTH) and demonstrated that monthly measurement was associated with a higher likelihood of readings being within the recommended range. Yokoyama et al 17 concluded that in patients for whom serum CKD-MBD markers exceeded target range, weekly monitoring of calcium and monthly monitoring of PTH levels were associated with achievement of guidelinerecommended targets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A change in monitoring frequency from quarterly to monthly can reportedly increase the percentage of patients reaching target iPTH values. 16 However, we often suggest iPTH monitoring every 3–6 months for maintenance hemodialysis patients in our own clinical practice. This protocol can be well received by patients because of its better cost-effectiveness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, the unique measurement pattern for serum calcium/phosphorus levels (weekly/biweekly) observed in Japanese settings allowed us to analyze the effectiveness of intensive monitoring patterns on the likelihood of achieving target ranges or prescription change. In contrast, a previous before–after study in the USA was only able to examine the change in likelihood of achieving target ranges of PTH, calcium and phosphorus values after switching from trimonthly to monthly [ 10 ], which is less frequent than the ‘intensive monitoring (weekly/biweekly)’ pattern adopted in some Japanese facilities, likely because US facilities comply with the KDIGO guideline, whereas Japanese facilities comply with the JSDT guidelines (Table 1 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Findings from a previous study suggested that the PTH target range specified in the KDOQI guidelines was achieved more often after frequency of monitoring mineral markers was switched from quarterly to monthly [ 10 ]. However, given that those results were obtained in a before–after study with no comparison group, conducted at a single center, whether the increased rate of achieving target range PTH levels was due to increased monitoring frequency or due to increased use of cinacalcet or vitamin D receptor activator (VDRA) irrespective of changes in monitoring frequency remains unclear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%