2008
DOI: 10.3182/20080706-5-kr-1001.00825
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Fractional Order Proportional Integral Controller for Varying Time-Delay Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(33 reference statements)
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is noticed that since the Smart Wheel is a delay-dominated system, it will result in higher jitter margin using an optimal proportional integral derivative (OPID) controller. This is in confirmation with the results obtained in the work of Varsha et al [37]. However, for systems with L and T in the range [0.1 · · · 1], the upper bound on jitter margin is increased manyfold.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is noticed that since the Smart Wheel is a delay-dominated system, it will result in higher jitter margin using an optimal proportional integral derivative (OPID) controller. This is in confirmation with the results obtained in the work of Varsha et al [37]. However, for systems with L and T in the range [0.1 · · · 1], the upper bound on jitter margin is increased manyfold.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…It is noticed that since the Smart Wheel is a delay-dominated system, it will result in higher jitter margin using an OPID controller. This is in confirmation with the results obtained in the work of Bhambhani et al [37]. …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The proposed methodology can be easily validated for commonly encountered FOPTD processes (14) also which are much easier to handle with PID controllers. Astrom & Hagglund [65] studied such lag dominated (15) and delay dominated (16) processes which have been tested over a network with drop and variable delays with the proposed tuning technique like that presented in Bhambhani et al [29], [66]. The GA based PID and FOPID tuning results are shown reported in Table 5 with the corresponding closed loop response and control signals in Fig.…”
Section: Validation Of the Tuning Methodology For Lesser Complicated mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, the experimental works on the coupled tanks system, which cover the inflow and the outflow, are affected by some disturbances, such as inaccuracy of apparatus, man-made error and unfamiliar skill, and would give the inappropriate results [7]. Due to these reasons, the steady-state of the operating height level in the coupled tanks system is not easy to be addressed [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%