2006
DOI: 10.2514/1.16790
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Finite-Time Feedback Controllers for Nonlinear Systems with Terminal Constraints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The terminal constraints in the problem definition are associated with terminal Lagrange multipliers, , that are constant over time. The relationship between the costate vector t and the gradient of the value function that connects dynamic programming and the calculus of variation approaches is: t @I xt; t @xt (5) A key relationship between the terminal Lagrange multipliers and optimal return function is established in [21] @I xt; t @ 0 xt f f (6) The SSM is a procedure to approximately solve the HJB equation. The method is thoroughly discussed in [21] and consequently only highlights are presented here.…”
Section: Brief Overview Of the Series Solution Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The terminal constraints in the problem definition are associated with terminal Lagrange multipliers, , that are constant over time. The relationship between the costate vector t and the gradient of the value function that connects dynamic programming and the calculus of variation approaches is: t @I xt; t @xt (5) A key relationship between the terminal Lagrange multipliers and optimal return function is established in [21] @I xt; t @ 0 xt f f (6) The SSM is a procedure to approximately solve the HJB equation. The method is thoroughly discussed in [21] and consequently only highlights are presented here.…”
Section: Brief Overview Of the Series Solution Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, a recently developed series solution method has been shown to be useful for problems subject to nonlinear terminal constraints. Vadali and Sharma [21] recently presented a series solution method (SSM) to synthesize nonlinear feedback solutions to finite time, nonlinear optimal control problems subject to nonlinear terminal constraints. The SSM can be considered a generalization of the well-known sweep method that is tailored to handle nonlinear polynomial systems with nonlinear terminal constraints.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, due to the time-varying HJB equation, the solution to the HJB equation for a finite-horizon optimal control [14][15][16] is timevarying in nature, which complicates the analysis compared to the infinite horizon optimal control. Second, the value function should satisfy terminal constraint whereas the constrained condition is taken as zero for infinite horizon optimal control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, the value function should satisfy terminal constraint whereas the constrained condition is taken as zero for infinite horizon optimal control. In [15], a method of power series to deal with the finite-horizon optimal problem with small nonlinearities was given, and in [16] the time-varying HJB equation was changed into a state-dependent differential Riccati equation, then an approximate optimal control was obtained by a truncation in the control equation. In [16,17], the neural network with time-dependent weights was utilized and calculated in backward-in-time manner.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…monomial expansions [8,9], orthogonal functions [10], radial basis functions [11], and neural networks [12]. Methods based on monomial expansions minimize local approximation errors and are best suited for systems with polynomial nonlinearities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%