1978
DOI: 10.1364/josa.68.001665
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal estimation in signal-dependent noise

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To provide practical experimental results of our method, we shall refer to the affine noise variance model [5], which is one of the most suitable for modeling the noise in digital image sensors. According to this model, the noise variance is approximated as…”
Section: Methods a Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To provide practical experimental results of our method, we shall refer to the affine noise variance model [5], which is one of the most suitable for modeling the noise in digital image sensors. According to this model, the noise variance is approximated as…”
Section: Methods a Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(31) the lower bound on the variance in the signal-dependent case is smaller than that achievable in the case of signal-independent noise [6]. This indicates the potential performance improvement for the inclusion of signal-dependent noise model.…”
Section: The Image Observation Modelmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Fll"' Fllll (6) with F flo being the transpose of F ~>ll· Using the formula for the inversion of a partitioned matrice [7. p.l83-184]. the CRLB for the desired parameter vector a is given by Cov (a) ;;l:: :F,,-1 where a is any unbiased estimator of a and the reduced information matrix F,, is…”
Section: F = £[ ()Lnp(6) ()Lnp(6)]mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To simulate this optical noise and the white noise created by different sources localized in the image processing system, we used the model proposed by Froehlich et al 15 A noisy irradiance I'(m, n) was computed from I(m, n) by degrading each pixel with additive noise, so I'(m,n) = I(m,n) + kI(m,n)ni + n2 ,…”
Section: Computer Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%