2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2022.05.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Emergency Department Care Practices for Persons Living With Dementia: A Scoping Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A step towards giving dementia due esteem could start with the ED. There have already been advances to care practices in the ED for people with dementia, including dementia inclusive bays and communication tools 38 . However, priority areas identified in this study included improved ergonomics for people with reduced cognitive reserve, including clear signage and quiet areas; improved communication from staff that is respectfully sensitive to the needs of individuals with dementia; reduced time to assessment to avoid worsening anxiety; consideration of community‐based investigations to avoid admission where possible; and being accompanied by a family caregiver or familiar other.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A step towards giving dementia due esteem could start with the ED. There have already been advances to care practices in the ED for people with dementia, including dementia inclusive bays and communication tools 38 . However, priority areas identified in this study included improved ergonomics for people with reduced cognitive reserve, including clear signage and quiet areas; improved communication from staff that is respectfully sensitive to the needs of individuals with dementia; reduced time to assessment to avoid worsening anxiety; consideration of community‐based investigations to avoid admission where possible; and being accompanied by a family caregiver or familiar other.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through a rigorous process, they identified and prioritized research gaps in the emergency care of PLWD 4 . The four priority areas identified included (1) detection of ED patients with impaired cognition, 5 (2) communication and decision‐making with PLWD and their care partners, 6 (3) care transitions for ED patients with impaired cognition, 7 and (4) clinical best practices in the ED setting for PLWD 8 . The workgroup then performed a scoping review for each topic and developed specific questions within each area that would have the greatest impact on PLWD 5–8 .…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The four priority areas identified included (1) detection of ED patients with impaired cognition, 5 (2) communication and decision‐making with PLWD and their care partners, 6 (3) care transitions for ED patients with impaired cognition, 7 and (4) clinical best practices in the ED setting for PLWD 8 . The workgroup then performed a scoping review for each topic and developed specific questions within each area that would have the greatest impact on PLWD 5–8 . GEAR 2.0‐ADC is now awarding $1.1 million in pilot research funding (using financial support from the NIH, the West Health Institute, and the Emergency Medicine Foundation) over 3 years to address these priority areas and questions.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…ED discharge care transitions have been prioritized within the 2014 Geriatric ED Guidelines 1 and the 2018 launch of the American College of Emergency Physicians geriatric ED accreditation process. 14 Recent ED-centric initiatives, as part of the Geriatric Emergency care Applied Research 2.0 Network -Advancing Dementia Care, [15][16][17][18] identified the need for the development of patient-and care partner-reported outcome measures that capture what matters most to stakeholders during ED care transitions. 6,9 As a first step toward developing a novel care partner-reported outcome measure, we sought to assess the barriers experienced by care partners of PLWCI during ED discharge care transitions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%