2008
DOI: 10.1007/s11269-008-9368-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Dynamic Monitoring Network Design and Identification of Unknown Groundwater Pollution Sources

Abstract: The identification of unknown pollution sources is a prerequisite for designing of a remediation strategy. In most of the real world situations, it is difficult to identify the pollution sources without a scientifically designed efficient monitoring network. The locations of the contaminant concentration measurement sites would determine the efficiency of the unknown source identification process to a large extent. Therefore coupled and iterative sequential source identification and dynamic monitoring network … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some of the initial contributions in identification of unknown groundwater pollution sources proposed the use of linear optimization model based on linear response matrix approach (Gorelick et al, 1983) and statistical pattern recognition (Datta et al, 1989). Some of the important contributions to solve the unknown groundwater pollution sources identification problem include: non-linear maximum likelihood estimation based inverse models to determine optimal estimates of the unknown model parameters and source characteristics (Wagner, 1992); minimum relative entropy, a gradient based optimization for solving source identification problems (Woodbury et al, 1998); embedded nonlinear optimization technique for source identification (Mahar and Datta, 1997; inverse procedures based on correlation coefficient optimization (Sidauruk et al, 1997); Genetic Algorithm (GA) based approach (Aral et al, 2001;Singh & Datta, 2006); Artificial Neural Network (ANN) approach , 2007; constrained robust least square approach (Sun et al, 2006); classical optimization based approach (Datta et al, 2009a; inverse particle tracking approach (Bagtzoglou, 2003;Ababou et al, 2010); heuristic harmony search for source identification (Ayvaz, 2010); Simulated Annealing (SA) as optimization for source identification (Jha & Datta, 2011;Prakash & Datta, 2012, 2013, 2014a. A review of different optimization techniques for solving source identification problem is presented in Chadalavada et al (2011) and Amirabdollahian and Datta (2013).…”
Section: B Datta Et Al 42mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the initial contributions in identification of unknown groundwater pollution sources proposed the use of linear optimization model based on linear response matrix approach (Gorelick et al, 1983) and statistical pattern recognition (Datta et al, 1989). Some of the important contributions to solve the unknown groundwater pollution sources identification problem include: non-linear maximum likelihood estimation based inverse models to determine optimal estimates of the unknown model parameters and source characteristics (Wagner, 1992); minimum relative entropy, a gradient based optimization for solving source identification problems (Woodbury et al, 1998); embedded nonlinear optimization technique for source identification (Mahar and Datta, 1997; inverse procedures based on correlation coefficient optimization (Sidauruk et al, 1997); Genetic Algorithm (GA) based approach (Aral et al, 2001;Singh & Datta, 2006); Artificial Neural Network (ANN) approach , 2007; constrained robust least square approach (Sun et al, 2006); classical optimization based approach (Datta et al, 2009a; inverse particle tracking approach (Bagtzoglou, 2003;Ababou et al, 2010); heuristic harmony search for source identification (Ayvaz, 2010); Simulated Annealing (SA) as optimization for source identification (Jha & Datta, 2011;Prakash & Datta, 2012, 2013, 2014a. A review of different optimization techniques for solving source identification problem is presented in Chadalavada et al (2011) and Amirabdollahian and Datta (2013).…”
Section: B Datta Et Al 42mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To resolve the above-mentioned issue while the actual measurement of contaminant sources is missing, many researchers began to use the inverse solution method to identify groundwater pollution sources. A significant number of statistical and deterministic methods have been proposed to solve this inverse problem considering the hydrogeological conditions known [5][6][7][8][9][10]. Extensive reviews on the identification methods of pollution source characteristics and the applications of various inverse modeling techniques in pollution source identification have been described in past research [11][12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this method, the contamination source characteristics identified using available observed concentrations are utilized to design a new monitoring network. Then the new selected monitoring locations are used sequentially to improve the accuracy of identified source characteristics [3,14,[19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%