2019
DOI: 10.1080/17453674.2019.1611215
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal duration of anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis in total hip arthroplasty: new evidence in 55,540 patients with osteoarthritis from the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association (NARA) group

Abstract: Background and purpose — The recommended optimal duration of the thromboprophylaxis treatment in total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients has been a matter of debate for years. We examined the association between short (1–5 days), standard (6–14 days), and extended (≥ 15 days) duration of thromboprophylaxis, with regards to the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), major bleeding, and death in unselected THA patients. Patients and methods — We performed a cohort study using prospectively collected data… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(55 reference statements)
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 2013 , Pedersen et al. 2019 ). If use of thromboprophylaxis is related to fixation method we would be confronted with residual confounding in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 2013 , Pedersen et al. 2019 ). If use of thromboprophylaxis is related to fixation method we would be confronted with residual confounding in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 In spite of all these implemented guidelines on thromboprophylaxis therapy following THA and TKA, about 1.5% of patients still develop symptomatic VTE, which may be explained by several factors. 9,10 First, thromboprophylaxis is not 100% effective, for example, the effectiveness of LMWH on VTE prevention following THA and TKA is estimated to be approximately 50%. 7 Thus, some patients still develop VTE despite pharmacological thromboprophylactic strategies.…”
Section: De S Pite Thromboprophyl a Xis 1 5% Of Patients S Tillmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the current situation (strategy 1), 1.5% of patients develop postoperative VTE despite the use of thromboprophylaxis therapy, assuming drug effectiveness of 50%. Consequently, assuming a baseline major bleeding risk of 0.15% and relative risk for major bleeding from thromboprophylaxis of 5.0, 0.75% of patients develop postoperative major bleeding, 9,10 leading to a total of 22.5/1000 complications (15 VTEs + 7.5 bleedings). To further lower VTE rates, the only option is to intensify thromboprophylaxis (strategy 2).…”
Section: Intensified Thromboprophylaxis In All Versus Individualized mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simply increasing the intensity of thromboprophylaxis (ie, a higher dosage or longer duration) is not advised because this comes with an increased risk of major bleeding. The estimated risk of major bleeding following total hip and knee arthroplasty is approximately 0.75% 10,11 . Therefore, it would be clinically relevant to know which patients have an increased risk of VTE so that thromboprophylaxis can be tailored to individual patient characteristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The estimated risk of major bleeding following total hip and knee arthroplasty is approximately 0.75%. 10,11 Therefore, it would be clinically relevant to know which patients have an increased risk of VTE so that thromboprophylaxis can be tailored to individual patient characteristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%