2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal duration of adjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk node-negative (N–) breast cancer patients: 6-year results of the prospective randomised multicentre phase III UNICANCER-PACS 05 trial (UCBG-0106)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the progress in medical scientific research and the increase in clinical trials, researchers constantly optimize the selection of chemotherapy regimens to achieve the best survival time and minimum adverse reactions. For example, Kerbrat's group conducted a randomized phase III trial comparing six cycles of 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, and CTX (FEC) to four cycles of adriamycin and CTX (AC) in patients with breast cancer, and showed that there was no significance in both disease-free survival and overall survival between the FEC and AC regimens, while reproductive toxicity was more severe in the FEC regimen (5). These results indicate that four cycles of the AC regimen for breast cancer treatment inflict less damage on ovarian function.…”
Section: Choice Of Chemotherapy Regimenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the progress in medical scientific research and the increase in clinical trials, researchers constantly optimize the selection of chemotherapy regimens to achieve the best survival time and minimum adverse reactions. For example, Kerbrat's group conducted a randomized phase III trial comparing six cycles of 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, and CTX (FEC) to four cycles of adriamycin and CTX (AC) in patients with breast cancer, and showed that there was no significance in both disease-free survival and overall survival between the FEC and AC regimens, while reproductive toxicity was more severe in the FEC regimen (5). These results indicate that four cycles of the AC regimen for breast cancer treatment inflict less damage on ovarian function.…”
Section: Choice Of Chemotherapy Regimenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, some phase III trials did not show significant differences between shorter and longer adjuvant ChT duration in limited-stage BC patients. [27][28][29] On the other hand, none of these studies was conducted in the neoadjuvant setting, and most of them did not use anthracycline-taxane concomitant or sequential treatments, thus reducing their informative potential in the current clinical scenario. Finally, in those studies that compared neoadjuvant ChT regimens of different duration, different cytotoxic compounds and treatment schemes were used, thus limiting the possibility to draw definitive conclusions about the clinical impact of modifying treatment duration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%