1995
DOI: 10.1016/0375-9601(94)00919-g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal distinction between two non-orthogonal quantum states

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

10
298
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 315 publications
(308 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
10
298
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The optimal POVM (28) can be also obtained numerically. We demonstrate feasibility of iterative solution of the symmetrized extremal equations (16), (17), (18), and (19) for mixed quantum states (26) with the angle of separation θ = π/4. The trade-off of the relative success rate and the probability of inconclusive results is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Discrimination Between Two Mixed Qubit Statesmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The optimal POVM (28) can be also obtained numerically. We demonstrate feasibility of iterative solution of the symmetrized extremal equations (16), (17), (18), and (19) for mixed quantum states (26) with the angle of separation θ = π/4. The trade-off of the relative success rate and the probability of inconclusive results is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Discrimination Between Two Mixed Qubit Statesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…An interesting alternative approach has been suggested by Ivanovic, Dieks, and Peres (IDP) for the discrimination of two pure states [14,15,16,17] and extended to N linearly independent states by Chefles and Barnett [18,19,20,21]. These states can be discriminated unambiguously, provided that we allow for some fraction of the inconclusive results P I .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These authors found the optimal solution when the two states are being selected from an ensemble in which they are equally likely. The optimal solution for the situation in which the states have different weights was found by Jaeger and Shimony [4]. We proposed an optical implementation of the optimal procedure along with a more compact rederivation of the general results and also showed that the method is useful in other areas of quantum information processing [5] such as, for example, entanglement enhancement [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…If we denote by Q ′′ the average probability of failure when distinguishing between the two states {|ψ 1 and |ψ 2 }, we know that Q ′′ = |O 12 | (Refs. [1]- [4]). For the case we are considering, |O 12 | = |O 13 | = s, and we see that Q < Q ′′ .…”
Section: Comparison To the Case When All States Are Discriminatedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A more general bound for two states with arbitrary a priori probabilities was later obtained by Jaeger and Shimony [6].…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%