2021
DOI: 10.1002/sim.9238
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal diagnostic test allocation strategy during the COVID‐19 pandemic and beyond

Abstract: Timely diagnostic testing for active SARS-CoV-2 viral infections is key to controlling the spread of the virus and preventing severe disease. A central public health challenge is defining test allocation strategies with limited resources. In this paper, we provide a mathematical framework for defining an optimal strategy for allocating viral diagnostic tests. The framework accounts for imperfect test results, selective testing in certain high-risk patient populations, practical constraints in terms of budget a… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This has been studied by other researchers for their individual testing policies but could be expanded to use pooled testing. 50 Pooled testing tends to work best in circumstances of low and relatively stable prevalence of the virus, as it means that a lot of the pools will come back negative. This reduces the number of individuals that have to be tested individually and so freeing up more tests for pools.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This has been studied by other researchers for their individual testing policies but could be expanded to use pooled testing. 50 Pooled testing tends to work best in circumstances of low and relatively stable prevalence of the virus, as it means that a lot of the pools will come back negative. This reduces the number of individuals that have to be tested individually and so freeing up more tests for pools.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means elderly people (and other groups at higher risk) would be more likely to be included in the pooled testing. This has been studied by other researchers for their individual testing policies but could be expanded to use pooled testing 50 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, PCR tests are considered the gold standard in comparison to antibody and antigen tests. 55,56 Since the growth of infections occurs over time, it is necessary to observe the general patterns over a period of time and determine if it is progressive or persistent. Below we visualize the run of performed PCR tests and corresponding COVID-19 reported infections (see Figure 2) as well as their normalized variants, that is, infection rates (see Figure 3, which includes COVID-19 waves and VOC curves as well) for CW 11/2020-04/2023.…”
Section: Progression Of the Coronavirus Pandemic In Germanymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, antigen tests are very specific but not sensitive, so assuming active infection against a negative test result needs to be confirmed in turn with a PCR test. Thus, PCR tests are considered the gold standard in comparison to antibody and antigen tests 55,56 …”
Section: Coronavirus Pandemic In Germany: Monitoring the Infection Ra...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rapid adoption of commercial wearable devices such as smartwatches and activity trackers brings forth opportunities to apply artificial intelligence methods toward the development of novel tools to support an intelligent disease detection infrastructure. Methods such as reinforcement learning or graph neural networks have already been proposed to aid contact tracing and surveillance testing 18 , 19 . Multiple studies suggest the utility of digital biomarkers, objective and quantifiable digitally collected physiological and behavioral data (e.g., resting heart rate (RHR), step count, sleep duration, and respiratory rate), collected by consumer devices along with patient-reported symptoms to monitor the progression of respiratory and influenza-like illnesses 20 – 27 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%