2018 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/icc.2018.8422572
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Detection Interval for Absorbing Receivers in Molecular Communication Systems with Interference

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The optimal reception delay of the absorbing receiver was approximately derived in [28], thus providing a reliable guide for receiver design. Second, truncating the symbol interval in advance means that the detection process will be terminated ahead of the end of a symbol period, as proposed in [31] for the MCvD system comprised of a transmitter, an absorbing receiver, and an interference source. The authors of [31] found a proper detection interval, which can effectively overcome the interference from unintended transmitters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The optimal reception delay of the absorbing receiver was approximately derived in [28], thus providing a reliable guide for receiver design. Second, truncating the symbol interval in advance means that the detection process will be terminated ahead of the end of a symbol period, as proposed in [31] for the MCvD system comprised of a transmitter, an absorbing receiver, and an interference source. The authors of [31] found a proper detection interval, which can effectively overcome the interference from unintended transmitters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, truncating the symbol interval in advance means that the detection process will be terminated ahead of the end of a symbol period, as proposed in [31] for the MCvD system comprised of a transmitter, an absorbing receiver, and an interference source. The authors of [31] found a proper detection interval, which can effectively overcome the interference from unintended transmitters. Third, extracting a portion of the symbol duration means that the detection process will start late and end early.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, [11], [15]- [17] did not consider the impact of external interference from an unintended transmitter when optimizing the detection interval in terms of the system performance and only considered the internally generated inter-symbol interference (ISI) and constant-mean noise from the environment. The detection interval was optimized for minimizing the BER in [11], [15], [17], and for maximizing the capacity in [16] 1 . Moreover, [11], [15], [16] determined the optimal detection time interval by exhaustive search, whereas [17] derives an approximately optimal detection time interval.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…‚ We optimize the detection interval and improve the BER 1 The period length τ in which molecules are absorbed by the receivers and removed from the environment, i.e., the period that is not the detection interval, was investigated and defined in [15] as the cleanse time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation