2006
DOI: 10.1109/tsp.2006.880317
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Design of Magnitude Responses of Rational Infinite Impulse Response Filters

Abstract: Abstract-This paper considers a design of magnitude responses of optimal rational infinite impulse response (IIR) filters. The design problem is formulated as an optimization problem in which a total weighted absolute error in the passband and stopband of the filters (the error function reflects a ripple square magnitude) is minimized subject to the specification on this weighted absolute error function defined in the corresponding passband and stopband, as well as the stability condition. Since the cost funct… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following the approach described in [16], the transfer function can be expressed in the so-called polar form as (3) where the and are the zero and pole radii and and are the corresponding angles in the plane, respectively, and 4Although (1) and 3are equivalent, there are, nevertheless, significant differences when performing the optimization, notably in the evaluation of the constraint matrices. Consequently, the performance of the optimization algorithm as well as that of the resulting digital filters can be affected as will be discussed in Section VI.…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Following the approach described in [16], the transfer function can be expressed in the so-called polar form as (3) where the and are the zero and pole radii and and are the corresponding angles in the plane, respectively, and 4Although (1) and 3are equivalent, there are, nevertheless, significant differences when performing the optimization, notably in the evaluation of the constraint matrices. Consequently, the performance of the optimization algorithm as well as that of the resulting digital filters can be affected as will be discussed in Section VI.…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, MATLAB ® function iirlpnormc in [2] implements a least-th Newton method that uses barrier constraints to assure the stability of the resulting filter. A more recent method reported in [3] uses a constraint transcription method to achieve an efficient solution of a non-smooth non-convex objective function with continuous functional constraints. Since there is no restriction on the resulting phase response, these methods generally yield a better magnitude response than methods that also optimize the phase response.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to the problem discussed in [15], in which it consists of a smooth cost function, the method used in [15] cannot be applied to solve this optimization problem. To solve this optimization problem,…”
Section: Notationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An iterative power allocation scheme is developed in [3]. It employs theNash equilibrium (NE) theory for solving the non-convex optimization problem [4], [5]. Here, the objective function is to maximizethe capacity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%