2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.267
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Design of Feeder-bus Network Related to Urban Rail Line based on Transfer System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since 72.8% of GHG emissions in the transportation sector are produced by road traffic [2], it is important to increase the attractiveness of rail transport. This can be partly achieved by promoting intermodality between trains and buses [3][4][5]. Other strategies for promoting the use of rail systems are to increase service quality [6][7][8], reliability [9][10][11], and competitiveness with personal cars, by optimising service schedules and operations [12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since 72.8% of GHG emissions in the transportation sector are produced by road traffic [2], it is important to increase the attractiveness of rail transport. This can be partly achieved by promoting intermodality between trains and buses [3][4][5]. Other strategies for promoting the use of rail systems are to increase service quality [6][7][8], reliability [9][10][11], and competitiveness with personal cars, by optimising service schedules and operations [12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most previous studies on FTS route design mainly included two categories of approaches [8]: continuous analytical and discrete optimization. In the analytical approaches, optimal relationships between route spacing, stop spacing, and frequency could be found with an idealized FTS network structure based on a uniformly distributed demand in the study area [9][10][11].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, these approaches also optimized the stop locations and the route structures, and their headways by considering the time-dependent [12], space-dependent [13], and time-and-space-dependent demands [14][15][16][17]. However, these analytical methods have significant limitations in practical applications of FTS route design [8], because the two key model inputs were idealized FTS network structures and the demand was uniformly distributed.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Chen et al [26] proposed a two-phase mode to cope with DRT FBNDP. Deng et al [27] proposed a model to solve the multi-level cost structure (passengers' cost and operators' cost) of M-to-M DRT. Pan et al [28] presented a bi-level model to serve the maximum number of passengers in the feeder transit system in the upper level and to obtain the optimal operational cost for transit operators in the lower level.…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%