2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsr.2011.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal design of a sliding mode AGC controller: Application to a nonlinear interconnected model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
43
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the aforementioned research work, some studies make tentative consideration on the GRC problem. In [1,7,8,12], GRC is considered in the simulation, but neglected in the controller design. Therefore, the validity of these methods to deal with GRC lacks theoretical support.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the aforementioned research work, some studies make tentative consideration on the GRC problem. In [1,7,8,12], GRC is considered in the simulation, but neglected in the controller design. Therefore, the validity of these methods to deal with GRC lacks theoretical support.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To enhance the robustness and reliability of the control system, some fuzzy-logic-based LFC methods are introduced in [6][7][8][9]. In addition, some advanced control technologies are utilized to improve LFC performance, such as sliding mode methods [10][11][12], optimal or suboptimal feedback control methods [13][14][15][16], and robust control methods [17][18][19]. Considering the delay in the open communication network, the authors in [20][21][22] analyze the influence of time delay on the LFC and present the relevant controller design methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present work considers 2 power system models to investigate the performance of the proposed optimized SMC controller. The transfer function block diagram and system parameters of power system model 1 consisting of thermal nonreheat turbines shown in Figure includes conventional parameters such as bias factor ( B k ), integral controller gain ( K ik ), regulation droop ( R k ), governor ( T gk ) and turbine time constants ( T tk ), power system gain ( K pk ), power system time constant ( T pk ), and tie‐line synchronizing coefficients ( T kh ) of area k to area h . The transfer function of thermal nonreheat turbine G tk ( s ), its governor G gk ( s ), and power system load are Gtk(),s=11+sTtk, Ggk(),s=11+sTgk, and Gpk(),s=Kitalicpk1+sTpk, respectively.…”
Section: Mathematical Modeling Of 2‐area Interconnected Power System mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sliding mode control technique with SMC logic is based on the development of control law that depends on feedback and switching vector gains to minimize the deviations in frequency and tie‐line power more rapidly. The control law for k th area of an LFC‐based power system is given by the following equation: uk=ϕkmTxm=m=1nϕkmxm0.72em;k=1,...,r;0.36emm=1,...,n, where feedback gains, ϕkm=0.36em{},0.48emρitalickm0.48emitalicif0.24emxmψk>00.12emρitalickm0.48emitalicif0.24emxmψk<00.84em, where u k is input signal to k th area, x m is the state variable vector, ρ km is m th feedback gain constant for k th area, and n is the total number of state variables. The switching hyperplane ψ k is formulated as follows: ψk=SkTxm=0, …”
Section: Mathematical Modeling Of 2‐area Interconnected Power System mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation