2001
DOI: 10.1109/43.905671
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal design of a CMOS op-amp via geometric programming

Abstract: We describe a new method for determining component values and transistor dimensions for CMOS operational amplifiers (op-amps

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
267
0
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 435 publications
(276 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
2
267
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Geometric programming has been used in various fields since the late 1960s; early applications of geometric programming can be found in the books Avriel (1980), Duffin et al (1967), Zener (1971) and the survey papers Ecker (1980), Peterson (1976), Boyd et al (2007). More recent applications can be found in various fields including circuit design Chen et al 2000;Dawson et al 2001;Daems et al 2003;Hershenson 2002;Hershenson et al 2001;Mohan et al 2000;Sapatnekar 1996;Singh et al 2005;Sapatnekar et al 1993;Young et al 2001), chemical process control (Wall et al 1986), environment quality control (Greenberg 1995), resource allocation in communication systems (Dutta and Rama 1992), information theory (Chiang and Boyd 2004;Karlof and Chang 1997), power control of wireless communication networks (Kandukuri and Boyd 2002;O'Neill et al 2006), queue proportional scheduling in fading broadcast channels (Seong et al 2006), and statistics (Mazumdar and Jefferson 1983).…”
Section: Geometric Programmingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geometric programming has been used in various fields since the late 1960s; early applications of geometric programming can be found in the books Avriel (1980), Duffin et al (1967), Zener (1971) and the survey papers Ecker (1980), Peterson (1976), Boyd et al (2007). More recent applications can be found in various fields including circuit design Chen et al 2000;Dawson et al 2001;Daems et al 2003;Hershenson 2002;Hershenson et al 2001;Mohan et al 2000;Sapatnekar 1996;Singh et al 2005;Sapatnekar et al 1993;Young et al 2001), chemical process control (Wall et al 1986), environment quality control (Greenberg 1995), resource allocation in communication systems (Dutta and Rama 1992), information theory (Chiang and Boyd 2004;Karlof and Chang 1997), power control of wireless communication networks (Kandukuri and Boyd 2002;O'Neill et al 2006), queue proportional scheduling in fading broadcast channels (Seong et al 2006), and statistics (Mazumdar and Jefferson 1983).…”
Section: Geometric Programmingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The only disadvantage and limitation is that the design problem has to be carefully formatted first to make it suitable for the treatment of the geometric programming algorithm. However, all the above approaches are based on the assumption that the structures of the cell elements are relatively fixed and subject to no radical topology changes [9]. A multi-objective evolutionary algorithm approach is reported for automatic synthesis of topology and sizing of a MEMS 2-D meandering spring structure with desired stiffnesses in certain directions [10].…”
Section: Extensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous works have been done in the field of analog design automation to enable fast design at the block level. Different strategies and approaches have been proposed during the evolution of analog design automation, such as simulation-based optimization [5,9,17], symbolic simulation [10], artificial intelligence [6], manually derived design equations [4,21], hierarchy and topology selection [11], geometric programming [12,16] and memetic algorithms [15]. The main difficulty encountered for wide spread usage of these tools is that they require appropriate modeling of both devices (technology dependent) and circuit topologies in order to achieve the design objectives in a reasonable processing time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%