2012
DOI: 10.2495/cr120511
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal deployment of energy storage systems in a DC-electrified railway system

Abstract: Energy Storage Systems (ESSs) represent one of the main vectors for improving railway electrical systems. Former low reliability rates and life-time are being dramatically improved in recent times due to the intensive research on battery and capacitor technologies. However, little research has been conducted on the optimization of railway system infrastructure by incorporating ESSs. This paper presents a method for designing the best possible deployment of ESSs in a DCelectrified mass rapid transport system li… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conversely, a system with a substation that uses separate catenaries/cables to power the uplink and downlink is referred to as a 'separate OCS'. The light-rail or tram network studied in Morita et al (2008), Chymera et al (2010), Hirano et al (2015), and Tian et al (2016) are separate OCS, and the ones in Açikbaş and Söylemez (2007), López-López et al (2012) and Teymourfar et al (2012) are common OCS. The key difference between these two system configurations is that the common OCS allows energy transfer and exchange between uplink and downlink, whereas the separate OCS does not.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, a system with a substation that uses separate catenaries/cables to power the uplink and downlink is referred to as a 'separate OCS'. The light-rail or tram network studied in Morita et al (2008), Chymera et al (2010), Hirano et al (2015), and Tian et al (2016) are separate OCS, and the ones in Açikbaş and Söylemez (2007), López-López et al (2012) and Teymourfar et al (2012) are common OCS. The key difference between these two system configurations is that the common OCS allows energy transfer and exchange between uplink and downlink, whereas the separate OCS does not.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Present-day models (Shiokawa and Tagaki, 2012;López-López et al, 2012;Ciccarelli et al, 2012) often consider catenary voltage levels and train speeds for determining the optimal operation of energy storage equipment.…”
Section: The Idea Behind the Proposed Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Pankovits et al, 2013) presents a methodology for the design of hybrid railway feeding substations including storage systems and renewable energy, with a local approach. (López-López et al, 2012) introduces a Mixed Integer Programming formulation of an optimization problem aiming to minimize the energy consumption of a DC-Electrified railway using storage systems, including a load flow of the network. Their linearization of the load flow is consistent with their application, but it cannot meet our requirements.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%