2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal demand response operation of electric boosting glass furnaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Solutions such as demand response (DR), whereby users of electricity modify their daily (and sometimes seasonal) demand in order to close the power demand–supply gap have been widely investigated, with a plethora of available literature reporting both theoretical concepts and applications to end‐users in the residential, commercial (popularly, buildings 1,2 ) and industrial realms. While a comprehensive review is beyond the scope of the current paper, we recall several examples of the latter application domain that come from chemical processing and related industries: chlor‐alkali 3,4 (which will be discussed later in this paper as well), air separation, 5‐7 pulp and paper production, 8 cement kilns, 9 glass furnaces 10 and steel manufacturing 11 . These works typically assume engagement in the long‐term (day‐ahead) markets, but participation in short‐term (frequency regulation) programs has also been considered 12,13 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Solutions such as demand response (DR), whereby users of electricity modify their daily (and sometimes seasonal) demand in order to close the power demand–supply gap have been widely investigated, with a plethora of available literature reporting both theoretical concepts and applications to end‐users in the residential, commercial (popularly, buildings 1,2 ) and industrial realms. While a comprehensive review is beyond the scope of the current paper, we recall several examples of the latter application domain that come from chemical processing and related industries: chlor‐alkali 3,4 (which will be discussed later in this paper as well), air separation, 5‐7 pulp and paper production, 8 cement kilns, 9 glass furnaces 10 and steel manufacturing 11 . These works typically assume engagement in the long‐term (day‐ahead) markets, but participation in short‐term (frequency regulation) programs has also been considered 12,13 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Along these lines, we are also interested in assessing the potentials of switching the energy sources. For instance, there are gas‐fired but electrically boosted furnaces for glass production 67 . Here, temporarily increasing/decreasing the electricity consumption might be motivated either by economic or environmental considerations that do not necessarily need to result in similar operating schemes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a consequence, DR production scheduling models must explicitly account for the dynamics of the plant. [7][8][9] Prior results confirm that the participation of chemical plants such as air separation units (ASUs), 10,11 chlor-alkali plants, 12,13 glass furnaces, 14 and paper production 15 in DR initiatives holds significant economic promise for plant operators, along with grid balancing benefits stemming from reductions in power demand during peak hours.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%