“…Nevertheless, HPT has an important advantage because experiments on a magnesium alloy showed that it is generally feasible to conduct HPT processing at a relatively lower temperature than ECAP, including at room temperature (RT), because of the large hydrostatic pressure that is imposed on the sample during the processing operation. [21] For refractory metals, reports are now available on the processing of W by ECAP or HPT over a range of temperatures from 673 to 1273 K, [22][23][24][25] the processing of Ta by ECAP at RT [26][27][28][29][30][31] or at 1173 or 1473 K [32] and HPT at RT, [33][34][35][36][37] the processing of V by HPT at RT, [38][39][40] and the processing of Mo by ECAP or HPT at temperatures from 623 to 1073 K [41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48] and HPT at both RT [38,[49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57] and a cryogenic temperature of 80 K. [54,56] Although several reports are now available on the processing of Mo by HPT, there have been no systematic studies of the concurrent evolution of microstructural refinement and hardness in pure molybdenum as are available, for example, in conventional fcc metals such as aluminum, …”