2015
DOI: 10.1080/08957959.2015.1041522
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal deformation and ion irradiation modes for production of a uniform submicrograin structure in molybdenum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, HPT has an important advantage because experiments on a magnesium alloy showed that it is generally feasible to conduct HPT processing at a relatively lower temperature than ECAP, including at room temperature (RT), because of the large hydrostatic pressure that is imposed on the sample during the processing operation. [21] For refractory metals, reports are now available on the processing of W by ECAP or HPT over a range of temperatures from 673 to 1273 K, [22][23][24][25] the processing of Ta by ECAP at RT [26][27][28][29][30][31] or at 1173 or 1473 K [32] and HPT at RT, [33][34][35][36][37] the processing of V by HPT at RT, [38][39][40] and the processing of Mo by ECAP or HPT at temperatures from 623 to 1073 K [41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48] and HPT at both RT [38,[49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57] and a cryogenic temperature of 80 K. [54,56] Although several reports are now available on the processing of Mo by HPT, there have been no systematic studies of the concurrent evolution of microstructural refinement and hardness in pure molybdenum as are available, for example, in conventional fcc metals such as aluminum, …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, HPT has an important advantage because experiments on a magnesium alloy showed that it is generally feasible to conduct HPT processing at a relatively lower temperature than ECAP, including at room temperature (RT), because of the large hydrostatic pressure that is imposed on the sample during the processing operation. [21] For refractory metals, reports are now available on the processing of W by ECAP or HPT over a range of temperatures from 673 to 1273 K, [22][23][24][25] the processing of Ta by ECAP at RT [26][27][28][29][30][31] or at 1173 or 1473 K [32] and HPT at RT, [33][34][35][36][37] the processing of V by HPT at RT, [38][39][40] and the processing of Mo by ECAP or HPT at temperatures from 623 to 1073 K [41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48] and HPT at both RT [38,[49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57] and a cryogenic temperature of 80 K. [54,56] Although several reports are now available on the processing of Mo by HPT, there have been no systematic studies of the concurrent evolution of microstructural refinement and hardness in pure molybdenum as are available, for example, in conventional fcc metals such as aluminum, …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, HPT has an important advantage because experiments on a magnesium alloy showed that it is generally feasible to conduct HPT processing at a relatively lower temperature than ECAP, including at room temperature (RT), because of the large hydrostatic pressure that is imposed on the sample during the processing operation . For refractory metals, reports are now available on the processing of W by ECAP or HPT over a range of temperatures from 673 to 1273 K, the processing of Ta by ECAP at RT or at 1173 or 1473 K and HPT at RT, the processing of V by HPT at RT, and the processing of Mo by ECAP or HPT at temperatures from 623 to 1073 K and HPT at both RT and a cryogenic temperature of 80 K …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of ceramics with gradient properties has great prospects, when the surface layer differs in its characteristics from the corresponding parameters of the bulk layers. As shown in works [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24], surface treatment can be effectively carried out using low energy high current pulsed electron beam (LEHCPEB) [11][12][13], laser treatment [14,15] and high-power pulsed ion beam (HPPIB) [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. To study thin modified layers of dielectrics, the method of secondary ion mass spectrometry [25][26][27] and the Rutherford backscattering method [28,29] have proved to be very useful.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, studies are underway to modify the surface of metals and alloys by high-power pulsed ion beams [19][20][21][22]30]. At the same time, the physicochemical processes taking place in the nearsurface layers of dielectric materials under treatment HPPIB have been little studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation