2023
DOI: 10.3934/jimo.2022155
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal decision-making of green agricultural product supply chain with fairness concerns

Abstract: <p style='text-indent:20px;'>This study investigates the impacts of fairness concerns on a two-tier green agricultural product supply chain (GAPSC) with an agricultural cooperative making green input and a retailer making fresh-keeping input. Game models are constructed and compared in four scenarios: centralized decision-making, decentralized decision-making without fairness concerns, and decentralized decision-making with the retailer considering or not considering the agricultural cooperative's fairne… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study on the dual channel supply chain of fresh agricultural products mainly focuses on pricing and inventory decisions. For example, Dan et al [ 30 ] investigate the optimal combination of pricing and retailing services through the stackelberg game approach by establishing the manufacturer, retailer and dual-channel supply chain profit functions in decentralized and centralized models, respectively; Hu et al [ 31 ] establish four Stackelberg game models to provide optimization methods for agricultural supply chains from a green development perspective; Zhang et al [ 32 ] used stackelberg game to study the POPU strategy (Preorder-online, pickup-in-store) under competitive situations, comparing the retailers’ sales strategy choices under decentralized and centralized decision-making, which can effectively increase the market share and profitability when the POPU operation cost is lower; Zheng et al [ 33 ] considered the quality loss and quantity loss at the same time, and built the mathematical models of single-stage and multi-stage discount strategies respectively. By comparing the optimal discount ratio under decentralized decision making and centralized decision making models, they coordinated the dual channel supply chain.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study on the dual channel supply chain of fresh agricultural products mainly focuses on pricing and inventory decisions. For example, Dan et al [ 30 ] investigate the optimal combination of pricing and retailing services through the stackelberg game approach by establishing the manufacturer, retailer and dual-channel supply chain profit functions in decentralized and centralized models, respectively; Hu et al [ 31 ] establish four Stackelberg game models to provide optimization methods for agricultural supply chains from a green development perspective; Zhang et al [ 32 ] used stackelberg game to study the POPU strategy (Preorder-online, pickup-in-store) under competitive situations, comparing the retailers’ sales strategy choices under decentralized and centralized decision-making, which can effectively increase the market share and profitability when the POPU operation cost is lower; Zheng et al [ 33 ] considered the quality loss and quantity loss at the same time, and built the mathematical models of single-stage and multi-stage discount strategies respectively. By comparing the optimal discount ratio under decentralized decision making and centralized decision making models, they coordinated the dual channel supply chain.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They did not explore the fact that when a supply chain member has fairness concerns, its counter-member may or may not consider those concerns. The most relevant studies to this paper are those of Hu et al [61] and Sun and Zhong [62]. Hu et al [61] studied the fairness-concern behavior of an agricultural cooperative in the green agricultural product supply chain and examined the situation of the retailer both considering and not considering the fairness concerns of the agricultural cooperative.…”
Section: Fairness Concerns In the Supply Chainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the exploration of game dynamics and strategic decision-making among stakeholders, along with the design of a reasonable system for rewards, punishments, and supervision, holds significant theoretical implications and practical value in overcoming the current challenges faced in constructing and operating GIAFB. This will enable local governments to fully landmark advantages and strengthen characteristic agriculture (Hu et al. , 2023).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%