2012
DOI: 10.1002/pd.3974
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal cut‐offs for down syndrome contingent screening in a population of 10 156 pregnant women

Abstract: Although the study population was relatively small, the results confirm the advantage of using contingent screening and suggest optimal first trimester cut-offs of 1 : 30 (lower cut-off) and 1 : 900 (upper cut-off).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, we have used a contingent screening strategy to select pregnant women who would most benefit from IPD [ 4 , 17 19 ]. Contingent screening utilizes two first trimester cut-offs instead of one.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this study, we have used a contingent screening strategy to select pregnant women who would most benefit from IPD [ 4 , 17 19 ]. Contingent screening utilizes two first trimester cut-offs instead of one.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Women received an ultrasound examination which included an evaluation of gestational age and nuchal translucency (NT) measurement together with measurement of maternal serum free-beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) and pregnancy associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A). According to this testing, pregnant women were stratified in 3 categories: women with a risk of 1:900 or lower (low-risk group), women with a risk of 1:30 or higher (high-risk group), women with intermediate risk between 1:31–1:899 [ 4 , 17 19 ]. The result of this screening was given within 24 hours.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Of the remaining women, 79 were determined to be at low risk (LR; <1/900), 38 at intermediate risk (IR; 1:31 to 1:899), and 29 at high risk (HR; ≥1:30) for fetal aneuploidy according to a contingent screening protocol (Guanciali‐Franchi et al. , ). Thirty‐two women with positive biochemical screening results underwent an IPD procedure.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past decades, the accuracy of prenatal screening tests has been improved substantially. Currently, for a positive rate of about 2–5%, 85–90% of Down syndrome affected singleton pregnancies can be identified prenatally using the first trimester combine screening (FTS), integrated prenatal screening (IPS) or contingent prenatal screening . However, the performance of Down syndrome screening tests in twin pregnancies is less optimal .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%