Progress in Speech Synthesis 1997
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4612-1894-4_23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Coupling of Diphones

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We can also use this measure for optimal coupling [34]. This means we can also find the best place to join the two units.…”
Section: Unit Selection-based Synthesizer For Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…We can also use this measure for optimal coupling [34]. This means we can also find the best place to join the two units.…”
Section: Unit Selection-based Synthesizer For Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…With this in mind, it seems that there is little value in developing methods for high precision placement of phone boundaries. Techniques such as optimal coupling (Conkie and Isard, 1996) can adjust the actual cut points at synthesis time (typically by minimising the local join cost, after the unit sequence has been selected), compensating for some inaccuracy in label placement.…”
Section: Automatic Segmentation Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to further enhance the concatenation quality, we designed an optimization method that selects the best cut-markers according to a MEL-scale spectral distance, as suggested in [17]. This technique selects for each join a pitch marker from the first and from the second segment in such a way that the transition will occur where there is as much similarity between the two speech signals as possible.…”
Section: Segment Concatenationmentioning
confidence: 99%