2023
DOI: 10.3390/s23146474
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Control of Semi-Active Suspension for Agricultural Tractors Using Linear Quadratic Gaussian Control

Abstract: In this study, a semi-active suspension based on a hydro-pneumatic mechanism was designed to minimize the ride vibration using a suspension control algorithm. The performance of the algorithm was critical for controlling the characteristics of the target tractor. A linear-quadratic-Gaussian (LQG) optimal control algorithm was designed as a semi-active suspension control algorithm. The plant model for developing this algorithm was based on the parameters of an actual tractor. The rear suspension deflection was … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ref. [3] designed a semi-active suspension based on hydropneumatic mechanism and a semi-active suspension controller with a linear quadratic gaussian (LQG) optimal control algorithm. Ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ref. [3] designed a semi-active suspension based on hydropneumatic mechanism and a semi-active suspension controller with a linear quadratic gaussian (LQG) optimal control algorithm. Ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yang et al [87] optimized AVB 2 (k) by 4.87% using ground-hook control. Other researchers such as Chen et al [88], Zhang et al [89], Ning et al [90], Alfadhli et al [91], Li et al [92], Bingül et al [93], Wei et al [94], Theunissen et al [95], Xu et al [98], Kouet al [99], Shirahatt et al [102], Ahmad et al [103], Anandan et al [105], Qiao et al [106], Nan et al [107], Liu et al [108], Dong et al[109], and Ahn et al[110] have also proposed their own control strategies, with an optimized distribution of AVB 2 (k) ranging from 4.87% to 85.77%. The maximum optimization of the vehicle acceleration AVB 2 (k) was 85.77%, provided by Gomonwattanapanich et al[83].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%