“…Further strategies to increase structural control under large earthquakes include comparative studies (e.g., SAVD systems using passive, viscous, and ER dampers presented by Ribakov et al, 2001); the use of combined systems (e.g., smart isolation Madden et al, 2003]; smart isolation plus semi-active stiffness dampers [Agrawal and Yang, 2000]; and SAMD plus variable damping devices [Chey et al, 2010;Collins et al, 2008]); and the incorporation of MR dampers, especially in smart isolation [Jung et al, 2006;Spencer et al, 2001;Yoshioka et al, 2002]), but also with the purpose to assess specific issues, such as the torsional seismic response control of a 3-story reinforced concrete frame-shear wall eccentric structure [Hong-Nan and XiuLing, 2009] and the whipping effect between podium structure and multi-story buildings while subjected to earthquake motions [Xu et al, 2005]. Experimental research in systems targeting earthquake control have also focused on active bracing systems (ABS) [Loh et al, 1999;Reinhorn et al, 1993;Soong et al, 1991] and tendons systems [Cha et al, 1988;Chung et al, 1988Chung et al, , 1989Joghataie and Mohebbi, 2012;Lin et al, 2010;Soong and Manolis, 1987;Spencer et al, 1998]. Integration of structural design and control scheme [Cimellaro et al, 2009a,b;Lu and Skelton, 2000], and the achievement of truly smart structures by integrating devices and materials within the main load-bearing structure [Chopra, 2002;Morales-Beltran and Teuffel, 2013] has been proposed previously with the purpose of increasing the efficiency of controlled response building structures.…”