2008 7th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation 2008
DOI: 10.1109/wcica.2008.4593275
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal control of Buck converter by state feedback linearization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Traditional techniques, such as state-feedback, optimal control, and PID control, which are based on first principles, can partly accomplish these goals. Nevertheless, they may not effectively respond to sudden process changes or malfunctions [53,58]. Tab.…”
Section: Control Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional techniques, such as state-feedback, optimal control, and PID control, which are based on first principles, can partly accomplish these goals. Nevertheless, they may not effectively respond to sudden process changes or malfunctions [53,58]. Tab.…”
Section: Control Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [14], it designs a nonlinear controller based on Lyapunov function, and it proves that it has global stability, good dynamic and static characteristics, but its computational complexity and difficult to implement. Using the optimal control method in switching power converter achieves a stable operation in a wide range when the system operates in a large fluctuation range and the controller has a strong follower performance, and it also improve the system dynamic performance significantly [15][16]. The optimal control of nonlinear systems generally look for objective functional performance indicators and obtain the minimum value of the objective function along all possible trajectories of the system, so this problem is usually considered to resolve partial differential equations for the Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman, but solving Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman is very difficult in most cases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sliding mode control having strong robustness and stability in a wide margin has been proved in [15,16], but it cannot eliminate the steady-state error and also has oscillation problem. Optimal nonlinear control method using the power converter has been proposed in [17][18][19], and it has proved that the method can operate in a stable way in a wide fluctuating range and has strong robustness. Moreover, [17][18][19][20] also point out that the optimal control is more suitable for trajectory tracking problem, which also proves its stability and effectiveness, and [21,22] also focus on the optimal control and prove that this method has good performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optimal nonlinear control method using the power converter has been proposed in [17][18][19], and it has proved that the method can operate in a stable way in a wide fluctuating range and has strong robustness. Moreover, [17][18][19][20] also point out that the optimal control is more suitable for trajectory tracking problem, which also proves its stability and effectiveness, and [21,22] also focus on the optimal control and prove that this method has good performance. Photovoltaic grid-connected inverter also can be considered in the current trajectory tracking problem, and using the optimal control can significantly improve performances of the system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%