2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2016.12.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal control of an SIVRS epidemic spreading model with virus variation based on complex networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This together with the boundedness of the state variables and coefficients of the controlled system over the finite interval [0, T ], make it possible to use the existence result presented in theorem 9.2.1 in the book of Lukes to prove this theorem. Hence, the following conditions should be satisfied (see the works of Fister et al and Xu et al for similar arguments): (1)The set of solutions of the controlled system and u i ∈ Ω, i = 1,2, is not empty; (2)The control space Ω is closed and convex; (3)The right‐hand side of the controlled system is continuous, bounded, and can be written as a linear function with respect to the controls with coefficients depending on the states; (4)The integrand of the objective functional is convex on Ω with respect to u i , i = 1,2, and there exist constants ρ > 1, C 1 > 0, and C 2 such that Ifalse(tfalse)+12truei=12Wiui2false(tfalse)C1()truei=12false|uifalse(tfalse)false|2ρfalse/2C2. Attending to the definition of Ω and the nonnegativity of the state variables, the set of solutions of the controlled system with initial conditions and u i ∈ Ω, i = 1,2, is not empty, which proves the Condition 1. The Condition 2 is satisfied since the control set Ω is closed and convex by definition.…”
Section: Optimal Control Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This together with the boundedness of the state variables and coefficients of the controlled system over the finite interval [0, T ], make it possible to use the existence result presented in theorem 9.2.1 in the book of Lukes to prove this theorem. Hence, the following conditions should be satisfied (see the works of Fister et al and Xu et al for similar arguments): (1)The set of solutions of the controlled system and u i ∈ Ω, i = 1,2, is not empty; (2)The control space Ω is closed and convex; (3)The right‐hand side of the controlled system is continuous, bounded, and can be written as a linear function with respect to the controls with coefficients depending on the states; (4)The integrand of the objective functional is convex on Ω with respect to u i , i = 1,2, and there exist constants ρ > 1, C 1 > 0, and C 2 such that Ifalse(tfalse)+12truei=12Wiui2false(tfalse)C1()truei=12false|uifalse(tfalse)false|2ρfalse/2C2. Attending to the definition of Ω and the nonnegativity of the state variables, the set of solutions of the controlled system with initial conditions and u i ∈ Ω, i = 1,2, is not empty, which proves the Condition 1. The Condition 2 is satisfied since the control set Ω is closed and convex by definition.…”
Section: Optimal Control Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the function G(x) is uniformly Lipschitz continuous (satisfying the assumption of condition 1) and satisfies the required bound (5) of the Cesari Theorem. For the proof of condition 3 we refer to reference [34].…”
Section: Existence Of An Optimal Control Pairmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the function G ( x ) is uniformly Lipschitz continuous (satisfying the assumption of condition 1) and satisfies the required bound of the Cesari Theorem. For the proof of conditions 3 and 5, we refer to the work of Xu et al Based on the previous discussion, the proof is completed.…”
Section: The Optimal Control Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%