1986
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9496(1986)112:2(183)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Control Model for Groundwater Management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

1987
1987
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Considerable effort has been put into using numerical models to evaluate technical aspects of groundwater management. For example, numerical models have been used to predict impacts of groundwater extraction upon aquifers [Ebraheem et al, 2002;Gorelick, 1983], optimize extraction rates [Bear and Levin, 1967;Casola et al, 1986;Makinde-Odusola and Mariño, 1989;McPhee and Yeh, 2004;Singh, 2012Singh, , 2014Tankersley and Graham, 1994;Wagner, 1995], adjust control based on actual system response [Jones, 1992], manage seawater intrusion [Reichard and Johnson, 2005;Rejani et al, 2008], and investigate implications of economic considerations [Booker et al, 2012;Bredehoeft and Young, 1970;Bromley, 1991;Gisser and S anchez, 1980;Koundouri, 2004;Mulligan et al, 2014] [Gallagher, 2015a;Queensland Government, 2002]. While these exciting studies hold great potential to investigate the intricacies of management, they did not separate the effectiveness of the plan from the state of the aquifer and because they were single site studies; nor did they elicit general attributes of a groundwater management plan that lead it to be testable.…”
Section: How Are Management Plans Tested?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Considerable effort has been put into using numerical models to evaluate technical aspects of groundwater management. For example, numerical models have been used to predict impacts of groundwater extraction upon aquifers [Ebraheem et al, 2002;Gorelick, 1983], optimize extraction rates [Bear and Levin, 1967;Casola et al, 1986;Makinde-Odusola and Mariño, 1989;McPhee and Yeh, 2004;Singh, 2012Singh, , 2014Tankersley and Graham, 1994;Wagner, 1995], adjust control based on actual system response [Jones, 1992], manage seawater intrusion [Reichard and Johnson, 2005;Rejani et al, 2008], and investigate implications of economic considerations [Booker et al, 2012;Bredehoeft and Young, 1970;Bromley, 1991;Gisser and S anchez, 1980;Koundouri, 2004;Mulligan et al, 2014] [Gallagher, 2015a;Queensland Government, 2002]. While these exciting studies hold great potential to investigate the intricacies of management, they did not separate the effectiveness of the plan from the state of the aquifer and because they were single site studies; nor did they elicit general attributes of a groundwater management plan that lead it to be testable.…”
Section: How Are Management Plans Tested?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considerable effort has been put into using numerical models to evaluate technical aspects of groundwater management. For example, numerical models have been used to predict impacts of groundwater extraction upon aquifers [ Ebraheem et al ., ; Gorelick , ], optimize extraction rates [ Bear and Levin , ; Casola et al ., ; Makinde‐Odusola and Mariño , ; McPhee and Yeh , ; Singh , ; Tankersley and Graham , ; Wagner , ], adjust control based on actual system response [ Jones , ], manage seawater intrusion [ Reichard and Johnson , ; Rejani et al ., ], and investigate implications of economic considerations [ Booker et al ., ; Bredehoeft and Young , ; Bromley , ; Gisser and Sánchez , ; Koundouri , 2004; Mulligan et al ., ], among others. These studies do not, however, investigate if sequential management decisions result in successful resource management or assess the effectiveness of the plan separate from the state of the aquifer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But the salt intrusion in coastal aquifers is a highly nonlinear process which requires an NLP approach for its appropriate solution (Gorelick et al, 1979;Casola et al, 1986). The nonlinearities in the aquifer management problems may arise due to nonlinear physical and managerial objective functions and constraints.…”
Section: Etcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Integrated management of groundwater pollution and withdrawal by using NLP models with embedded simulation constraints was presented by Keshari and Datta (1996). The management problem for optimal spatial and temporal groundwater allocation for agricultural use was solved by Casola et al (1986). The management model was formulated as a quadratic optimal control problem.…”
Section: Groundwater Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%