2015 IEEE-RAS 15th International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/humanoids.2015.7363428
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal control for whole-body motion generation using center-of-mass dynamics for predefined multi-contact configurations

Abstract: Multi-contact motion generation is an important problem in humanoid robotics because it generalizes bipedal locomotion and thus expands the functional range of humanoid robots. In this paper, we propose a complete solution to compute a fully-dynamic multi-contact motion of a humanoid robot. We decompose the motion generation by computing first a dynamically-consistent trajectory of the center of mass of the robot and finding then the whole-body movement following this trajectory. A simplified dynamic model of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such behavior can, in theory, be expected from using the iLQR state feedback controller (10). Still, even though small angular offsets in hip and knee propagate to an error in base height and there may be calibration errors in the draw wire encoder, the overall motion is followed very closely.…”
Section: Transfer To the Physical Systemmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such behavior can, in theory, be expected from using the iLQR state feedback controller (10). Still, even though small angular offsets in hip and knee propagate to an error in base height and there may be calibration errors in the draw wire encoder, the overall motion is followed very closely.…”
Section: Transfer To the Physical Systemmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…For example if base height was paramount in the OC problem, it would automatically sacrifice hip and knee joint tracking to keep the height deviation at a minimum. However, there are no theoretical guarantees that (10) stabilizes the system under model error and disturbances and we experience that the gains are too aggressive for a jumping motion on the real system. For a fair comparison, we, therefore, use a hand-tuned PD controller (11) in all of our experiments.…”
Section: Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, external forces and torques are also bounded. We follow here the approach proposed in [7] and consider constraints:…”
Section: B Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hand contacts with the environment can be important however, to improve stability, energetic efficiency, to interact with the environment, or to simply realize otherwise infeasible motions [4], [5], [6], [7], [8]. In this case, the constraint (1) is generally nonlinear, and we have to resort to a Newton method to obtain a solution, a potentially time-consuming and uncertain procedure involving iterative linearizations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…joint angles [21,20]. To accomplish all those tasks, it is desirable to observe humans themselves and prolongate the gained knowledge to the robotic complements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%