2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jksuci.2019.10.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal container resource allocation in cloud architecture: A new hybrid model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different experiments have been carried out, particularly, experiment 1 was done using 250 machines with a capacity of 100, experiment 2 was done using 300 machines with a capacity of 200, experiment 3 was done using 350 machines with a capacity of 400 and experiment 4 was done using 400 machines with capacity 800”. Furthermore, the adopted approach was calculated to the traditional schemes like velocity updated gray wolf optimization (VU‐GWO), 52 whale random update assisted lion algorithm (WR‐LA), 53 customized rider optimization algorithm (C‐ROA) 54 and MFO 45 and the outcomes were examined in terms of statistical analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different experiments have been carried out, particularly, experiment 1 was done using 250 machines with a capacity of 100, experiment 2 was done using 300 machines with a capacity of 200, experiment 3 was done using 350 machines with a capacity of 400 and experiment 4 was done using 400 machines with capacity 800”. Furthermore, the adopted approach was calculated to the traditional schemes like velocity updated gray wolf optimization (VU‐GWO), 52 whale random update assisted lion algorithm (WR‐LA), 53 customized rider optimization algorithm (C‐ROA) 54 and MFO 45 and the outcomes were examined in terms of statistical analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, the analysis was done for four experiments in terms of statistical analysis and cost function and the outcomes were obtained. At 80th iteration, the performance of the adopted model for experiment 1 has attained an improved solution with reduced cost over GA, SW-GA, SH-GA, GM-GA, LA, WOA, WR-LA, PSO and GWO schemes by 26 GWO models respectively. Thus the betterment of the adopted VU-GWO scheme has been confirmed from the simulation outcomes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, experiment 1 was carried out by deploying 250 machines with capacity 100, experiment 2 was carried out with 300 machines and capacity 200, experiment 3 was carried out by deploying 350 machines with capacity 400 and experiment 4 was carried out by deploying 400 machines with capacity 800. Also, the performance of the implemented VU‐GWO technique was examined and compared over other existing schemes namely; GA [32], swap mutation‐based GA (SW‐GA) [6], shrink mutation‐based GA (SH‐GA) [6], growth mutation‐based GA (GM‐GA) [6], lion algorithm (LA) [33] and whale optimisation algorithm (WOA) [34] whale random update assisted LA (WR‐LA) [35], PSO [30] and GWO [31] and the results were achieved in terms of cost function and statistical analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this, Experiment 1 was exploited by using 250 machines with capacity 100, Experiment 2 was exploited with 300 machines and capacity 200, Experiment 3 was exploited by deploying 350 machines with capacity 400 and Experiment 4 was exploited by deploying 400 machines with capacity 800. Additionally, the implemented approach in terms of performance was differentiated over other traditional structures such as ROA (Binu and Kariyappa, 2018), whale optimisation algorithm (WOA) (Mirjalili and Lewis, 2016), whale random update assisted LA (WR-LA) (Vhatkar and Bhole, 2019), particle swarm optimisation (PSO) (Zhang and Xia, 2017), grey wolf optimisation (GWO) (Mirjalili et al , 2014) and velocity updated grey wolf optimisation (VU-GWO) (Netaji and Bhole, 2020) and the outcomes were analyzed. Table 2 depicts the diverse parameters of algorithms.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%