2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.06.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal cache search depends on precision of spatial memory and pilfering, but what if that knowledge is not perfect?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, if the target had not been found within the search area, it was certain that the target was not within that area. These two assumptions are consistent with those in our mathematical analysis (Pfuhl et al, 2009). If the probability of detecting the target when coming across it is low, or navigation inaccurate, other search patterns may be preferable (Wehner & Srinivasan, 1981).…”
Section: Materials and Proceduressupporting
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, if the target had not been found within the search area, it was certain that the target was not within that area. These two assumptions are consistent with those in our mathematical analysis (Pfuhl et al, 2009). If the probability of detecting the target when coming across it is low, or navigation inaccurate, other search patterns may be preferable (Wehner & Srinivasan, 1981).…”
Section: Materials and Proceduressupporting
confidence: 75%
“…A quantitative analysis of the relationship between estimated precision and optimal search radius is presented in Pfuhl et al (2009). The following boundary conditions apply: If knowledge of the cache location is extremely precise-for example, the cache is almost certain to be within the area of a single probe-then such a single probe without finding the cache constitutes good evidence that the cache has been pilfered, even if the a priori probability of pilfering is very low.…”
Section: When To Stop a Search: Cache Retrievalmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is only possible to define optimal behaviour if the optimality model takes into account the limits of available information. Then one may quantify the possible gains from estimating the various forms of uncertainty (Stephens 1989;Dall et al 2005;Koops 2004;Pfuhl et al 2009). …”
Section: General Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The causes of food‐caching behaviour have received a great deal of attention from the perspective of animal cognition (e.g. Heinrich & Pepper 1998; Brotons 2000; Bugnyar & Kotrschal 2002; Emery, Dally & Clayton 2004; Dally, Clayton & Emery 2006; Hopewell & Leaver 2008; Pfuhl et al. 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%