2013
DOI: 10.1287/opre.2013.1163
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Budget Allocation for Sample Average Approximation

Abstract: Abstract. The sample average approximation approach to solving stochastic programs induces a sampling error, caused by replacing an expectation by a sample average, as well as an optimization error due to approximating the solution of the resulting sample average problem. We obtain estimators of an optimal solution and the optimal value of the original stochastic program after executing a finite number of iterations of an optimization algorithm applied to the sample average problem. We examine the convergence … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(35 reference statements)
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…OCBA and other Bayesian R&S procedures focus on maximizing PCS with a fixed budget and thus can be integrated with optimization procedures to reduce the effect of simulation noise on search progress. There have been a number of studies reporting integration of procedures such as OCBA with popular metaheuristics such as PSO (Horng et al, 2012) and genetic algorithms (GAs) for simulation optimization, and for SAA (Royset and Szechtman, 2013). Further efficiency can be improved by adapting OCBA to the specific comparison and selection rules of an optimization procedure.…”
Section: Ranking and Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…OCBA and other Bayesian R&S procedures focus on maximizing PCS with a fixed budget and thus can be integrated with optimization procedures to reduce the effect of simulation noise on search progress. There have been a number of studies reporting integration of procedures such as OCBA with popular metaheuristics such as PSO (Horng et al, 2012) and genetic algorithms (GAs) for simulation optimization, and for SAA (Royset and Szechtman, 2013). Further efficiency can be improved by adapting OCBA to the specific comparison and selection rules of an optimization procedure.…”
Section: Ranking and Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The requirements on optimality functions exactly ensure this property. Moreover, there is ample empirical indications and some theoretical evidence (see for example [3,[8][9][10]) that computational benefits accrue from approximately solving a sequence of approximating problems with increasing fidelity, each warmstarted with the previously obtained point. Optimality functions are tools to carry out such a scheme and give rise to adaptive rules for determining the timing of switches to higher-fidelity approximations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In those areas, given a computing budget, the goal is to optimally allocate it across different task within the simulation, and to determine the resulting rate of convergence of an estimator as the computing budget tends to infinity. The allocation may be between exploration of new points and estimation of objective function values at known points, as in global optimization [18,19] and stochastic programming [20,21], between estimation of different random variables nested by conditioning [22], or between performance estimation of different systems, as in ranking and selection [23]. Even though these studies deal with rather different applications than semi-infinite minimax problems, they motivate the present paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%