2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.simpat.2013.04.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal blank design based on finite element method for blades of large Francis turbines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Edge Deviations Location (mm) Location (mm) 2 illustrates that the measured deviations are below the required values. It should be noted that the predicted values generally follow the measured ones, with few exceptions (e.g., surface points 3,5,6,12), where the measured deviation is greater than the predicted one. In both cases, however, the improvement in the product geometry is not as large as predicted by the optimization procedure and corresponding computer simulations.…”
Section: Surface Deviationsmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Edge Deviations Location (mm) Location (mm) 2 illustrates that the measured deviations are below the required values. It should be noted that the predicted values generally follow the measured ones, with few exceptions (e.g., surface points 3,5,6,12), where the measured deviation is greater than the predicted one. In both cases, however, the improvement in the product geometry is not as large as predicted by the optimization procedure and corresponding computer simulations.…”
Section: Surface Deviationsmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…While FEM simulations serve primarily as a tool for investigating the feasibility of a forming process in the sense of avoiding sheet metal defects [4], they can also be employed as a part of the forming tool, blank shape [5], or blank thickness optimization procedures with the aim of achieving proper geometrical acceptability of the product. This enables the minimization of tool production costs through reducing the number of tool modifications or even eliminating some forming stages, such as the trimming phase [6]. With FEM simulations, the process can also be optimized for the use of thinner sheets [7], all to decrease financial expanses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As can be proved that a developable surface must be a ruled surface simultaneously, a common method for developable surface interpolation is boundary triangularization [5][6][7][8]. But the boundary triangularization grow its patterns exponentially with the number of sample points on boundary, it could be infeasible in practice.…”
Section: Dynamic Programming Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its vertexes are recorded anti-clockwise by ( 1, 2, [7]. According to the common rule of C language, i  means i+1, i  means 1 i  .…”
Section: Dynamic Programming Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we propose the method of coupling curved edge finite element (CEFE) and natural boundary element (NBE) to solve an anisotropic quasilinear problem in an unbounded domain. The CEFE-NBE method is based on the artificial boundary method [1] [2], namely the coupling of edge finite element (EFE) and natural boundary element (NBE) method [3] [4]. The EFE-NBE method has been used to solve many linear problems [5] [6] and is generalized to solve quasilinear problems [7] [8] [9] [10] [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%