2016
DOI: 10.1109/tpwrs.2015.2394355
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Bidding, Scheduling, and Deployment of Battery Systems in California Day-Ahead Energy Market

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
73
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 143 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To verify the above statement, first, assume that r φ ij [t] = 1. In that case, from (27) and (30), one can conclude (28), while (31) is not binding. Next, assume that r φ ij [t] = 0.…”
Section: A Nonlinearity In Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To verify the above statement, first, assume that r φ ij [t] = 1. In that case, from (27) and (30), one can conclude (28), while (31) is not binding. Next, assume that r φ ij [t] = 0.…”
Section: A Nonlinearity In Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…[34, p. 226], solving problem (6) is equivalent to solving the system of nonlinear equations in (7)- (27). Note that, the nonlinearity is due to the complementary slackness constraints in (16)- (23).…”
Section: A Nonlinearity In Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although several studies have been conducted in relation to market mechanisms for electricity networks with uncertainty, no market mechanism has so far been proposed for a regional network of prosumers that considers both the uncertainty and strong correlation described above [17], [30]- [32].…”
Section: Correlationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large share of the existing PBUC work assumes perfect foresight of future prices and the storage plant to be small enough to be a price-taker in the considered market (e.g., [18][19][20][21][22][23]). Although quite some studies discuss a relaxation of the perfect price foresight assumption (e.g., [16,[24][25][26][27][28][29][30]), less attention has been given to the relaxation of the price-taking assumption in PBUC arbitrage models. However, either large-scale or multiple small-scale storage plants that are operated cooperatively could benefit from considering the price-effect of (dis)charge actions.…”
Section: Scope and Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%